Uaa HE ial ME ON VS aneee ee These developments represente: ur pavtan effor bs slose reeer woo lise ™ cile its propaganda line with conf. cting po.ics considerations West o incre fear Dluntly oring interest beginning last December n exp at on condem Soviet with consisten’ not clearly was attack atomic Soviet the use of nuclear weapons. Neverthe!) ss, Moscow has ‘ypicas:s snorec tne contradiction and has continued both lines At tne samecime, Mo cow his stressed its "leadership" in the field of “he peaceful use of atcrmmic emery, but has been careful not to encourige it- peop.e tc nope for anurmr sulting improvement in their stanuare « bving. oe pen ‘ne USSR mas ure vbr o aeh wanted to exploit agitation in the Wes’ fo r 4 pan om tests, but auas so in terms which would not inhibi ite own freedom *o tes* wi geneva, 3s nado Soviet interest in making disarma neni symnol of Sovie interes’ 7 pea ct has been hampered by Moscow's uw...) nenesse to offer ar effeet ve ries national control scheme. The Sov et e.ders nave ignored this, bowser simply avoiding any detailed discussion /f the mechanisn Cf dibar uncer! while focusing on the beguiling slovar-~ ° banring tne bomb ay bois up cuciear energy for peace. Peaceful Use of Atomic Encrg.. ine cates’ Sovie ela rm Dr gihe ss in applying atomic energy for peacefu parpoeses recailed sim uw: oplire es pansive claims in 1940 in respons: tc th» repcrt of the first Sexes ateomie ex plosion (which TASS ascribed to‘: lasting. «with the most up ’o daty tecnica! means.'') Although the satellites n {44° pave credence ‘Oa tepor’* atone USSR was using atomic energy to wivert tue OF and Yenesei Rivers, se Sovie press appeared to place this actior ir the raure. Minder question, at ue TN General Assembly, Vishinsky statec ‘la .. oniv tha atomic power sian Satu the USSR for blowing up mountains -- a ciaitr revivec bs the Huns cuar ot gar Szabad Nep on July 2, with the assert.or ‘ha’ tne fies’ Soviet arom. + <puosior took place in the Kara Kum desert anc v if used tO move nile ing «2 stones for the sake of industry. In the lignt of¢me vecent announcen.em, ~ af greater interest to recall the clair mam iv Radic Moscow orp Dee co oner os, 1949, that ‘in the future the Soviet ere uc power industtv &. le boop a tre form of a single nigh voltage grid + on fute tne first a om. vey ties power stations, " Soviet spokesn.en have coninuec 'O Speak im penetra portance of the peacefu: use of atomic energy. errs In April anc Muay ¢ he vm1 OW ever, Moscow was urging that attention ne des oted to tracitional powis seurees, warning that the application of atoriic energy was a “matier arnt hee pom! and apparently seekine to discoura.re nope of liminent progress 24 adr go tre peaceful application of atomic energy deperder' on a privr age een e: Dal the use of nuclear weapons. The effort « Pravda on Max 25°) gia? roe US the blame for the Lreakdown of vlietera talks on the peacetu. a) @ toon of atomic energy was particularly ‘ur:o.s. Fvavdano. oily 6 ote 1 vay v tempt to divert a small part of ator sc om ite ria “for peace Woy UNCLASSIFIED at ‘as 4