896 SESSION IV DISCUSSION iodine, although I realize they are not usually as important to man. Under certain conditions '*1 may be of health significance. It was very significant in the thyroid uptake by those men exploring a contaminated tunnel follewing an underground detonation in 1963. Obtaining better knowledge of ‘I cannot always be ignored from a health-hazard standpoint. MARTIN: I agree with that. However, no data were collected to in- dicate thyroidal uptake of "I or 5I by rabbits in the Sedan falloutfield. The objective was to study ‘I. Since the half-lives of ‘I (20.8 hr) and ‘55 (6.7 hr) are much shorter than the half-life of '*'I (8.04 days), we did not expect to find significant quantities of those isotopes in samples collected five days or more after the detonation. FROM THE FLOOR: Dr. Tamplin, what is the number of the UCRL report you mentioned ? TAMPLIN: UCRL-7945-T. BOYETT: Dr. Tamplin, you mentioned that a vital part of the program at LRL concerned the deposition rate of radionuclides on forage plants and animals, I believe. Are you gathering literature or has some information been obtained, as a part of this program, on the deposition of small particles on human skin? TAMPLIN: We ever, with respect entrance of iodine only kind of data skin. We have run haven’t been gathering information on that. Howto iodine, for example, we have worried about the in humans through the skin. This is probably the we have looked at that deals with deposition on the across some reports that deal with the collection of fallout on the fur of animals, and this, as Dr. Martin mentioned, leads to a route of entry through preening for jackrabbits. I think we also have reports about fallout on the fur of some rats that were housed in cages, but, so far as the deposition of small particles on human skin, we haven’t considered that. GENERAL DISCUSSION LENGEMANN: Dr. Ward, in all our experiments with cesium, we have noted that when milk cows are given radiocesium daily for a period of about 30 days, the milk radiocesium approaches 1.5% of the daily radiocesium intake per liter of milk. In your studies your animals only attained a value of 0.3%of the daily intake per liter of milk. How do you account for such a discrepancy between laboratory and field studies ? WARD: This is a thing that we have been interested in and have investigated to some extent. I believe it is related to the cellulose in

Select target paragraph3