3705 AND sr RETENTION FROM RONGELAP FOODS 147 Table 1— INTAKE DATA FOR *Sr AND 8'Cs IN RONGELAP FOOD, JULY 2 TO 8, 1963 — Intake for seven-day period Food item Pandanus Coconut milk Coconut meat Total intake Average intake per day Picocuries of ®*Sr per gram of calcium Sr, pe 8%Cs, pec Calcium, g 4,379 56 48 57,327 5,656 2,824 0.992 0.329 0.460 4,483 65,807 1.781 640 9,401 0.254 2,517 major portion of the activity of both radionuclides. The average Sr and '’Cs intake per day from these Rongelap foods was about 20 and 60 times higher, respectively, than from a normal New York City area diet during this time.’ Initially, the activity from the Rongelap food essentially masked the contribution from the normaldiet, but later in the study the effect of the normal diet on the excretion rates became increasingly important. In retrospect, it was unfortunate that the normal diet of the subject was not measured because the Sr and 87Cs levels in foods were increasing during this period. The “Sr and the '’cs levels found in the urinary and the fecal collections are given in Table 2 and are plotted as a function of time in Figs. 1 and 2. Calcium measurements were made on the food and excreta samples, but, since the calcium intake from the normaldiet was not known, the urinary and fecal calcium excretion data are difficult to interpret quantitatively. The average urinary calcium was 170 + 40 mg/day, and the average fecal calcium was 360 + 150 mg/day. These values do not indicate a metabolic abnormality, although the low fecal calcium reflects a very high absorption. In Fig. 1 the "Cs excretion via the urine and the fecesis plotted. The smoothed curves through the data points were drawn by eye. As has been observed in other studies,!?-!7 the main means of '*"Cs ex- cretion is urine. Fecal excretion fell off very rapidly, indicating that only a relatively small amount of the '*"Cs ingested was not absorbed. Neither the urinary nor the fecal excretion rate fell to preexperiment. levels at the end of 190 days. This was probably due to the increase in the normaldiet '°’Cs which took place during this period. The excretion pattern of Sr as shownin Fig. 2 contrasts markedly with that of '*’Cs. The fact that the majority of the ingested Sr was not absorbed by the body is evidenced by the high fecal excretion levels that were observed almost immediately following the consumption of

Select target paragraph3