RADIOACTIVITY ALONG THE 80TH MERIDIAN 493 1961 tests; this is in agreement with the reports that 85 to 90% of the Sr in rainfall at Abingdon and Milford Haven in the United Kingdom*! and at Westwood, N. J.°° during the spring of 1962 could be ascribed to the 1961 U.S.S.R. test series, In the May and June profile shown in Fig. 10, the pre-1961 debris continued to exhibit the expected shape with higher Sr values in the north as a result of the spring maximum there. The northern portion of the 1961 U.S.S.R. Sr profile was also relatively unchanged; the curve could not be extended south of the equator because of the influx there of fresh debris from the 1962 Operation Dominic I tests, which started April 25. The activity from the Christmas Island area arrivedat its highest concentration at the high-altitude site at Chacaltaya, Bolivia, as had occurred in past tests in the Pacific area.’:!! It was confined to the relatively low latitudes of the southern hemisphere. As indicated earlier, no significant quantity of this activity appeared at ground level in the northern hemisphere. During the July and August period, there was only a minor contribution of Sr from the U.S.S.R. 1962 tests to the northern-hemisphere air, and, in general, patterns of Sr throughout the world were similar to those of the previous period. In later periods it was not possible to make a completely objective assignment of debris tothe various sources because of the lack of sufficient analytical data to discriminate between the four possible sources of debris. For these last two periods, values based on past experience were assumed for the pre-1961 “Sr concentrations in the northern hemisphere. This permitted a resolution of the residual two-component mixture. The resulting profiles for the November and December period are shown in Fig. 11; the September and October profiles, which are not shown, were similar. At the end of 1962, the profiles of premoratorium "Sr and “Sr from the U. S. 1962 tests were nearly identical in the southern hemisphere. Moreover, activity ratios indicated the effective date of forma- tion of new debris at all these sites to be in June 1962. A stratospheric origin for both components thus appears reasonable. In the northern hemisphere, U.S.S.R. 1962 tests were the major contributor to the “Sr levels, and dates of formation in September and October were ob- tained. This is apparently a case where the direct tropospheric intro- duction of “Sr was of greater significance than deposition from a wellcharged stratospheric source. The peak in the U.S.S.R. 1961 Sr profile at Miami is due to the earlier arrival there of the start of the 1963 winter—spring subsidence of stratospheric debris. CONCLUSIONS This study of the fission-product content of the atmosphere has covered an interesting period of the nuclear age and in the development

Select target paragraph3