2.2.2 A'titude Absorption.

Because considerations of flight safety limit the mininwua altitu’

at which vircraft canflyover water, automatic ga‘ama monitors w.re mounted over the = ides of

two ships of Project 2.10, to measure the gamma-radiation field at 35 fect above the sea surface.
This was to provide low-altitude readings simultaneous with aircraft passes in the samc arca
at hivhee altitudes.
Survey aircraft made altitude-calibration passes over islands of the Eniwetok Atoll after Shot
Mohawk. After Shot Tewa, the P2V-5 dropped a smoke light in the open sea to be used as a
navigational reference and made altitude passes ir the vicinity. These data are examined for

the variation of radiation reading between different flight altitudes and given in Section 3.2.

Helicopter missions, after Shuts Seminole and Mohawk, obtained data similar to the altitude~correction-calibration data collected by the survey aircraft. Because the helicopters could not
saf ty hover at lowaltitudes, complete information could not be obtained. It had been planned to
obtain gamm-energy spectra at various altitudes above a contaminated surface. The Top Hat
duse-rate response was to be compared to the gamma-energy spectra to determine whether the
assumption of air-equipment response was valid. However, instrumentation difficulties and the
limitations in hovering altitudes resulted in fragmentary data. The survey using a scintameter

obtained dos= rate readings at altitudes between 25 and 1,000 feet.
2.3

INSTRUMENTATION

The major instrumentation consisted of aerial radiation detectors.

Scintillation survey meters

and ship-mounted gamma monitors were used for measurements relating to altitude-correction
factors. A spectrometer was used to obtain the distribution of the gamma energies at survey
altitudes. The instruments are described in Appendix B.

2.3.1 Aerial Survey. Each of the project aircraft had the following equipment: (1) Top Hat
aerial radiation detector, HASL TH-10-B (Appendix B); (2) detector control assembly, HASL
TC-14-A; (3) strip-chart recorder, Esterline Angus Co., AW; (4) telemeter assembly, HASL
TT-3-X; (5) power supply, HASL TB-6-A; and (6) radio transmitter, U.S. Navy ART-13. The
permanent components were installed by the Overhaul and Repair Department, U.S. Naval Air
Station, Alameda, California, at the air station prior to Operation Redwing. The removable
components were installed by project personnel after the squadron deployed to the EPG.

The location of the assemblies is indicated in Figure 2.3. The radiation detector was mounted
aft to avoid the major areas of aircraft contamination, namely, the engines, oil-cooler air intakes, leading edges of the wings, propellers, and front of the radome. The cabin intake vents
were sealed to prevent contamination of the interior ductwork. The control assembly and the
operator were placed forward, next to the navigator. This facilitated close correlation between
the navigational and radiation reports. The remainder of the equipment was located on an
available-space basis.

The relationship of the various sections, both in the aircraft and in the Program 2 Control
Center, is shown in Figure 2.4. The radiation detector and its associated control assembly

drives a strip-chart recorder to provide a permanent, continuous record of the radiation inten-

sities as measured in the aircraft. This detector is nearly air-equivalent from 80 to 1,400 kev,
Figure 2.5. An annular radiation shield is built into the detector to reduce the effect of aircraft
contamination.

The angular response due to this shield is shown in Figure 2.6.

The aircraft’s radio altimeter (U.S. Navy APN-1) supplies an altitude indication to the altitude

compensator, which modifies the radiation detector so that its output is a current that is propor-

tional to the radiation which would be measured at 3 feet above the surface. As the altitude
changes, the compensator corrects the resulting radiation change and keeps the ground-level
reading constant.

The telemetering system did not perform satisfactorily. The radiation readings on the
aircraft radiation-detector strip-chart recorder were, therefore, transmitted by voice over the
navigational net. At the control center, the radiation readings were logged and immediately
plotted.
19

Select target paragraph3