external and internal emitters for a base population of a few hundred people, the Task (lvout nad severe reservations «bout tne raliaity of the estimates. The recommendations of the Task Group are considered to be practicable and feasible, The largest cost item for the recommended cleanup would be the suppo.t base; the second largest item wouid be removal and disposal of contaminated and ot, uncontaminated scrap andthe cleanup, removal Soy hye et and disposal of plutonium contaminated soil. / Since the recommendations do not contemplate extensive decontamination of residual radioactivity in soil of northern islands such as JANET, the cost should be less than any approach involving ex- : tensive soil removal, disposal, and replacement wey actions. Following consideration and approval of the ” Task Group findings, the staff will inform we DNA and DOI. mo 4 a ! A briefing will then be developed and rehearsed for presentation to the people of Enewetak and their advisors during a joint AEC-DNA-DOl trip to the Pacific. This pre- sentation will be designed to be a vehicle for U.S. Government consultation with the people on the AEC recommendations and the proposed DNA-DOCI Draft Environmental Impact Statement ’ (DEIS). Opening remarks at the briefing would be delivered by senior AEC, DNA, and DOI otficials. in more detailed discussions to follow, AEC recommendations and the DEIS would be discussed by the AEC and DNA technica! representatives. After the visit, AEC staff will inform the Commission of results of these discussions, Recommendations: 1. 2. yePD Pewee, TITS, " 7 ew . wes byte wee ree sree sty te, + That alternative 3 and the associated criteria be approved. Note that the responsibility for disposal of contaminated material, including plutonium, rests with DNA. wre moe seen, mY aeMey Ta Nee eee -