external and internal emitters for a base
population of a few hundred people, the Task
(lvout nad severe reservations «bout tne
raliaity of the estimates. The recommendations of the Task Group are considered to be
practicable and feasible, The largest cost item
for the recommended cleanup would be the
suppo.t base; the second largest item wouid be
removal and disposal of contaminated and
ot,
uncontaminated scrap andthe cleanup, removal
Soy
hye
et
and disposal of plutonium contaminated soil.
/
Since the recommendations do not contemplate
extensive decontamination of residual radioactivity
in soil of northern islands such as JANET, the cost
should be less than any approach involving ex-
:
tensive soil removal, disposal, and replacement
wey
actions.
Following consideration and approval of the
”
Task Group findings, the staff will inform
we
DNA and DOI.
mo
4
a
!
A briefing will then be developed
and rehearsed for presentation to the people of
Enewetak and their advisors during a joint
AEC-DNA-DOl trip to the Pacific. This pre-
sentation will be designed to be a vehicle for
U.S. Government consultation with the people
on the AEC recommendations and the proposed
DNA-DOCI Draft Environmental Impact Statement
’
(DEIS).
Opening remarks at the briefing would
be delivered by senior AEC, DNA, and DOI
otficials.
in more detailed discussions to
follow, AEC recommendations and the DEIS
would be discussed by the AEC and DNA technica!
representatives. After the visit, AEC staff will
inform the Commission of results of these discussions,
Recommendations:
1.
2.
yePD
Pewee,
TITS,
" 7 ew
.
wes
byte wee ree
sree
sty
te, +
That alternative 3 and the associated criteria
be approved.
Note that the responsibility for disposal of
contaminated material, including plutonium,
rests with DNA.
wre moe
seen,
mY aeMey
Ta Nee eee
-