CHAPTER 3 - REORGANIZATION OF 532D ENGINERR:.BOAT & SHORE REGTMENT The personnel problem immediately became a major: one. Unit commanders screened their personnel and the Personnel Officer alerted his section to search all Forms 20's for the necessary qualifications and MOS's in the Regiment. However, it appeared obvious,due to..the lack of skilled key men, that MOS qualifications woul@-not be considered but only the necessary service time. The results of this were not,. favorable, since only sixty-five percent of the required gumber ( 520) were eligible, The greatest setback was due to a large percentage of the personnel due to be discharged from the service prior to- 30 June 1948. Appendages C-1, C-2, C-3 and C-4, indicates the turnover of personnel during the time of alert to the embarkation. During this period Company "E" had five (5) Officers and one hundred. sixty-five (165) enlisted men transferred to the Company, whileone (1) Officer and sixty-eight (68) enlisted men were transferred out of the organization. Seca wleme.. . Over-all changes affecting each of the units within,the Regiment were drastic, inasmuch as the line companies were re-infayced from| approximately four (4) Officers and one hundred (100). en|isted men to eight (8) Officers and two hundred and three (203) enjisted men, while Headquarters and Headquarters Company was reduced in strength from. one hundred and forty-eight (148) enlisted men to ninety-four (94) and j{ncreased in Officer strength from 22 to 23.. ek After exhausting local sources (Fort Worden) for additional men, there lacked about 100 EM to meet the prescribed number. Section Vi-a Lt. Colonel

Select target paragraph3