Table 2. Dust Flux by Collecting Compartments of Bagnold Sampler (ug/em*/day) * Julian Date C. Cy Cy C3 Cy Cs Ce C 140-172 172-194 194-221 221-264 264-299 299-333 333-361 361-27 27-54 54-83 83-118 118-151 180-210** 210-243 243-273 1172 1565 4170 1320 591.6 357.9 2.238 23.61 299.7 73.71 579.3 292.1 3273 1092 1142 1125 1273 1985 770.1 352.8 615.6 7.143 12.26 255.4 94.62 404.1 285.1 2312 582.3 371.4 120.1 304.8 330.0 180.8 76.92 99.60 0.618 2.925 86. 76 26.43 94.23 52. 86 394.2 126.3 78. 48 39.87 58. 80 60.39 58. 38 21.79 57.57 QO. 762 3.399 62.85 26.43 29.29 20.53 97.77 37.83 34.83 36.33 47.70 17.33 1.923 0 31.74 0. 381 0.345 39.60 9.999 15.27 10.55 29.78 13.13 4.302 1.584 1.152 4.938 9.549 0 34.71 0.426 8.379 42.03 10.98 14.58 3.516 46.26 14.10 21.25 2495 3255 6585 2341 1043 1197 11.57 49.41 786.3 235.6 1137 664.5 6153 1866 1652 *Al1]1 fluxes scaled over total collecting surface (75 em*). **Determined to be outlier using method of Tietjen, 1978. = soil creep, saltation, and total dust fluxes, respec- Ci, Coy---C5 collecting surfaces of 15 em? (1 cm wide) each; the mid- respectively. wide). Cc. represents a horizontal collecting surface 7 em? (1 cm heights of these surfaces (Z) are 7.5, 22.5, 37.5, 52.5, and 67.5 cm, 685