B
g
¢
e
é
i
E
g
i
E
4
!
R
E
5
3
earry qut the preject with this restriction. Diligent thought an‘ effort
|
went into methods and procedures which would reduos the dosage to the
seanpler erews and es a satter of fact, quite a bit was acoamplished
although these gained were usually wiped out by having the next
ionger an4 more ‘complex.
In this situation ef eouree ve must take
It should be well to bear in mind that no recsamendation which I make can
carry official weight. YI have no authorization to permit doses to those
for whas I em responsible beyond the point stipulated by the Divisian ef
Biology and Nedicine af the AEC. Purthermorve, DEM itself has no machinery
which permits {t to ‘authorize’ exposures greater than the mmbers vhich
disapproval of the AEC. None of this, hovever, prevents me fron making
my personal recamnendations, and these are as follows:
(2)
(2)
I recommend that the crews of the sampling
aircraft in Operation Haxritack follow precisely
the eeme recommendations az those imposed upan
then or permitted for them in Operation Redving,
and that their authorized exposure be 10r with
an absolute limitation ef 20r.
2 recommend that the past exposure records of
the participating Air Force personnel be
reviewed by & qualified Medical Corps Officer
to determine whether or not additicual exposure
above a level of 5r per year may properly be
recomended.
|
(3} I urge that consideration be given to firing
the responsibility for radiologic safety for
the personnel of Task Group 7.4 who will be
participating in Project 2.85. This is a
DDE
wi RE
mw
~—~