.
tae
_
\
meOe Che ae ee re ne

Porp/Baruiie/Hinscu/ConrRaD

216

substitution of isolcucine may be caused both by infrequent nongenctic
errors and by somatic mutations. However, isoleucine substitutions for
amino acids whose codons require more than one base substitution to change
into isoleucine codons can be considered to be due primarily to translational
errors because the likelihood of two base substitutions within the same codon
is the squarc of the frequency of a base substitution at one nucicotide, which

would be very infrequent. Thus, isoleucine substitution for amino acids like
glycine or alanine can be considered to result from translational errors only.
Some aminoacids are coded by triplets, some of which can and others which
cannot mutate from nonisoleucine to isoleucine codons by single base
substitutions, c.g. lysine, arginine, threonine and serine. Substitution of isoleucine for such amino acids would be by nongenetic errors at some positions,
but by somatic mutations plus nongenetic errors at other positions. The
distinction of these should be readily made by treatment of experimental

animals with base substitution mutagens; marked increases in isoleucine

substitution should occur only at positions where single base changes can
mutate nonisolcucine codons into isoleucine codons. By comparing the

substitution frecuencies of isoleucine for lysine at positions which are and

which are not affected by a base substitution mutagen, it should be possible
to access the relative contribution of translational errors and somatic
mutations toward the formation of erroneous proteins during protein synthesis in young and old animals,
In line with the above arguments, the data of LorrrieLp and VANDERJAGT [7] are pertinent and interesting. If their data are handled in a manner
similar to ours, i.c. to calculate the valine substitution for all the other amino
acids in the tetra- and octapeptide (except for the C-terminal amino acids ©
because valine substitutions for lysine would not yield the appropriate tryptic
peptides), their »verage substitution frequency would be 7.5 x 10-* per amino

acid residue compared with our value of 2.99 x 10-5 per amino acid residue.

These valucs are in good agreement and the twofold differences may actually
be due to specics differences. LOFTFIELD [6] has found that the majority of the
valine incorporated in the tryptic peptides of the rabbit a-chain is located at

positions where isofcucine is the coded amino acid (personal commun.). This

would seem to support their view that most of these substitutions are caused
by translational crrors. However, amino acids that are likely to be involved
in translational errors are the same ones which are coded for by triplets
wheresingle bascs distinguish nonisoleucine and isoleucine codons. Of greater
interest is the fact that the valine substitution in the tetrapeptide was lower
than in the octapeptide. The octapeptide contains 3 glycine residues,

Select target paragraph3