CC C \ f Congress CAPITOL HILL AOR EAE 1 licronesia OL SAIPAN . MARIAN4 ISLANDS 96350 Phone 9726/9743 Telex 724 yo. . Noe LO aT poof matt Dr. mhonert A. Conard Medicus. Derartiment Brooshaven vational Laboratory Unten, nev Terk hay poate ea Toe Tae eal ron Ten) TRS. CSERTATIVES 3 - or Sf “ i Tne ourvoece of ffice. 36% Mate —™ Conard this ietter is bo refer you to a to iu. Rover Rav of LRDA at the Jievada Operations ranserren! “f BEST COPY AVAILABLE 11973 letter dated juviy 9, 1976, from the neonpie of Utirik pote rs. peur Ur, by = ~ 5267 THOT pery we would also like to mahe reference to an earlier letter from Represertotive John Haglelzan to you following the Varch curvey. To date he has not received a response. FPrrthermore, Conrressman balos' letter dated Nay S$, LOTG to you Aas not been answered. Consequently, we should like te pose seme questions, and teek some clarifications with regard to the Ponselan-Utirik issue. We would, therefore, appreciate learning of your responses to the Keprecentatives who nade the innsuiries, and also what response to the Utirik letter has been sent by either you or by Hr. Romer Ray. porters feu Of TOOT ar Ge Furthermore, we have heard that people of Rongelav and Utirik have compleined that it was our Cormittee which said that no "descendants" of exnosed persons would receive T.D. cards. Public Law Yo. 5={5?, as amended by P.L. fo. 5-00, indicates that descendants are covered un'e~ the law. However, the benefits are accorded to the veople unter the TIVI-URPA agreement. Those who voula receive cards, would be those listed on the LiL roster. Purthermore, we recall that your position was thut there was no reason to include dercondants ov exnosed persons on the BIL roster for two reasons: i) it was unlikely tnat any effects would be teunsnitted to subseanuent senerations, and 2) puteins thom on the roster and thus giving thes T.D. cards would Lend them to believe that they fell into the some cossaze class Pongelspese, as the exnosed