because of the fallout tracks, if you remember back to some of the patterns
that we had previously shown.
Now, I will be speaking a little bit later
in terms of future plans on
some work we plan to do within the state
according to the recommendations you gave us last May.
There are some reconfirmatory spots that you were
CHAIRMAN MOSELEY:
going to look at.
MR. “CHURCH:Yes.
DR. MALIK:
I'11 go into a little more detail then, later on.
Was there any attempt to sample in the same places that
Kermit Larson's group-sampled?
10
MR. CHURCH:
No,
11
DR. MALIK:
I would sdrt of like to have a direct comparison in a few
12
places.
i3
-
MR.
CHURCH:
om.
Early in the’ project we had Van Romney go back to a
14
number of those stations that theycalled “Persistent Stations" and had him
15
take a sort of a last sweep of samples.through those stations and he -- do
16
you remember the status of that reportt=It's not a published report, but I
17
guess I failed to recognize it yesterday. . Those stations did reach into
Utah.
19
20
I think near Enterprise was the -- or, St. George, Veyo, Enterprise,
Montamesa and a couple of other test stations. ——
DR. ANSPAUGH:
They were typically not . the same kind -- they wouldn't
21
meet the same criteria in terms of lawns and the same thing that we are
22
looking for here, though.
23
MR. CHURCH:
They were basically desert areas.
That's true, and I was going to addthose same kinds of
24
words. _ They sampled, I believe they sampled soil, natura} vegetation in
25
those particular
26
Enterprise area, you could get jack rabbits and stuff like that,
27
don't think they are directly comparable to the EML. type of effort.
28
DR.
MALIK:
areas
and what wildlife was available;-such as
I was wondering about migration of
75
in the
but
I
clides from high