~—
CHAIRMAN MOSELEY:
w
MR. ZIMMERMAN:
MR. CHURCH:
Was that clarified to a certain extent?
Yes.
Mr. Chairman, I think it is probably also appropriate to
clarify the chemistry techniques.
made it confusing,
that
the REECo chemistry procedures
procedure td the EML one.
MR. BECK:
We either didn't make it clear, or we
is
an
identical
If I'm wrong, somebody correct me.
That's correct.
MR. KREY: “Na, that's correct.
MR. ZIMMERMAN:
That impression I got was that it was something
10
different because you were talking about eliminating the thorium,
11
recall.
12
ma
MR. KREY:
as
I
—
They are using the exact procedure.
There jis a little bit
13
of uncertainty as to why’ they thorium and the polonium is showing up in the
14
final product.
15
might explain it, but the procedure—is identical,
16
is, why did they get that when we don't.
17
same, at least as I understand it.
There are some~chemical reasons that we can propose that
18
CHAIRMAN MOSELEY:
19
DR. SARN:
and the confusion part
But the chemistry is exactly the
Dr. Sarn.
I don't think I can resist saying something about the CIC;
20
but I would say with the limited funds of CIC, we'll need to be selective
21
with regard to what kind of information it's going to gather and store, but
22
at the same time it must also be concerned with information which has been
23
shown to have a high public interest in addition -te- information that is
24
purely technical or scientific
25
dramatic and being mindful of other momentous events in the history of the
26
world, I think the creation of nuclear weapons and its testing is certainly
27
one of the key historical occurrences in the history of man, and I think
28
people
who operate
very
close
in nature.
to
285
it
I
think—that,
sometimes
fail
to
without being
realize
the