thing like that.
I don't know how you are going to do the screening.
Being an attorney,
I frankly don't always trust the attornies to do the
picking and choosing about what gets into the library, but some mechanism
needs to be established.
|
I thought, a comment I made before, that it's important that the Utah
mitk studies, whatever they are going to be,
be very closely coordinated
with the. CSU work, so that it is very congruent.
about REECo's cesium work and plutonium work,
I noticed when we heard
and then EML's which have
been going supposedly hand-in-hand, they are using different chemistries.
10 One had alreadydeveloped a chemistry, and the other, at least it appeared
ll
to me as a layman,—to have reinvented the wheel.
I would hope that we
12 could avoid that kind of .problen with the milk work.
13
And the soil samp Ling,~ it_may be because I missed a meaning, but I'm
14
somewhat concerned about what appears to me to be an absence of sampling in
15
the Utah County, Heber City areas, which are the milk sources for Salt Lake
16
and the Wasatch front where the bulk-of the Utah population is.
17
that that was done in the first EML “Survey that we saw about a year and-a-
18
half ago; but I don't particularly recall it as being related to the milk
19
producing areas.
—
20
That's all I have.
21
CHAIRMAN MOSELEY:
22
ing
it to our
It may be
summary?
23 extensive EML sampling
Can we clarify that issue right now without carryIt's my recollection. that there was
in Utah,
a fairly
and that this committee's recommendation
24
was that some of those be resurveyed in this process inorder to cross-
25
validate the two efforts and be certain that the methodology gave similar
26
results; but that not all of those areas be resampled again.
27
speak to the question about the specific areas that you talked about, and
28
maybe Bruce or some of the folks from EML can respond to that.
283
That does not