for the CIC, because I continue to be perplexed as to the level of produc-
tivity
relative
to
the
level
of
funding
and
really what
I
view
as
relatively meager information that has been provided to us with regard to
the time lines and the establishments of the priorities for work within
that Center.
critical
That leads really to my second recommendation which is for a
examination of the material
that
is now on hand for entry,
or
likely to be provided for entry, and to the establishment of priorities to
enter that material into the collection and continuation of the work in
terms of key words.
I guess I can best sum it up by saying, I suspect that there are docu-
10
1l ments that await handling by the Center that would be categorized in the
12 ten cent range; there are probably some that are worth a dollar; there are
13 some of the $10 variety;
there are probably some that are of the $100
14 variety; there may even be some, oh, $10,000 pieces of information there.
15 When the information has been presented to us here,
16
I sometimes have the
impression that the ten cent items are handled with about the same priority
17 as the $10,000 or vice versa.
18
The other item is one, and I may have frought my attention or recall-
19
ing in thumbing through the article here by Anspaugh and Church, and this
20 goes
21
to
the
information
question
in
terms
of
of
the
extent
natural
to
which
background
there
exposure
is
in
levels
one
place
across
the
22 region of interest, and I think that just as a general matter of practice
23
it
would
be
useful
to
take
the
opportunity
to
call
those
background
24 exposure levels to the attention of the interested individual anytime the
25 exposure
ahd dose
by
the
information
extent
to
is
provided from the
which in
cases
the levels
of
I'm
26
struck
27
attributable to the fallout are disappearing into the background that is
28
naturally there.
280
many
program here.
exposure