Table 7.
Comparison of the recent results of Beck and Krey (Be82)
based on contemporary measurements of 1376, with those of the TMCEFD.
Utah
Estimated exposure, R
location
Beg2¢
Beaver
~ Cedar City
Hurricane ©-:
Kanarraville ~
La Verkin
Milford
Minersville
Modena
Mt. Carme}
0.25
< 1.7
1.2
< 0.42
0.79
0.54
1.5
< 0.78
0.64
2.9
= SY
|
“=
3.5
0.65
0.84
0.49
1.6
0.31
2.9
3.7
0.79
0.49
1.9
_ < 0.42
jixs 0.69
Lomas 0.42
0:28
0.26
0.10
0.20
< 4.2
3.5
0.94
< 0.43.
0.54
< 6.42.
Panguitch
Ratio
< 0.42
0.42
Enterprise
Hatch -
Kanab
TMCEFD
0.70
< 0.78
0.40
Paragonah
0777
_
0.42
1.8
Parowan
0.77
7
0.42
1.8
St. George
2.6
.—
3.7
0.70
Washington
Average, geometric
.
1.7
4.)
|
4.3
2.8
0.39
1.5
1.7
~
3.3
0.52
in
Santa Clara
Veyo
0.88 x 2.22!
“The original numbers resulted from an integration of Hicks’ (Hi82)
calculations for exposure rate.
We converted to a number as
comparable as possible to those of the TMCEFD by-multiplying by the
Shielding and time correction factors from Table-t.
233