The next viewgraph (LRA-54) indicates that we have several communities
with multiple sites.
Now there's several different reasons why we have
In some cases, like Albuquerque is a good
communities with multiple sites.
example, we do have some information that leads us to believe that there
could be significant deposition from Nevada material
in Albuquerque.
So
ind
that we have included three sites, because it is a large town, so we can
examine that question.
Flagstaff,
I think we have less reason to believe
there is significant deposition there, but it is a large town which has
three good sites?
The other reason for doing this is to have a sufficient
10
number of
locations with
two
samples
ll
variability within the-same location.
such
that
we
can
look
at
sample
_
12
Now at some other sites, Boise is a good example, we had many areas
13
which had the same cesiumflux asmeasured with our field spectrometer, and
om
Ny
14
one site which had essentially-twice as much flux as any of the others.
15
Unfortunately,
16
better make sure that we included that, measured both of the areas.
17
Vegas is included, e.g., primarily because, again, it is a relatively large
18
town.
19
within the same area.
that happened tobe the State Capitol,
We want to
look
at
two
sites
that
Las
are geographically separated
—
20
That coneludes my presentation, Mr. Chairman.
21
DR.
CAROTHERS:
so we thought we'd
Lynn,
have you,
or has
Any questions?
EML -- I'm
sure
they must
22
have -- selected sites and taken a sample or two where you would expect to
23
find no NTS fallout at all?
24
DR. ANSPAUGH:
—
We have not done that yet oursetves. I think EML has
25
done quite a bit of work on that.
26
samples along the west coast of California to look at that.
27
28
DR.
CAROTHERS:
We do intend to take some additional
I was just wondering, because then if you did that
when you got done certain assumptions ought to be checked in a way.
197
Phil,