laboratory analysis for cesium-137.
geographical coverage here.
Now you see we have some pretty good
We do have some holes over in the area here in
the region of some interesting areas in Nevada that we simply have not been
able to locate sites which we feel comfortable with even on a B-level.
we are looking for some additional sites over in areas in Nevada.
So
But, as
you can see, we have extended our coverage now to a fairly good coverage of
Arizona,
northern Arizona,
and we have extended our coverage in several
areas here which were not originally tabulated by the Test Manager's
Committee.
10
.
12
13
We have some areas in Idaho where we believe there probably was
some fairly substantial fallout deposition that are now included; and we
have
some
areas
here
in
Utah
which
we
hope
might
help
give
us
some
additional information on how material got to Salt Lake City.
Now one of the tools we used that has been referred to before in this
14
process was this book.
Every member of the group had this book.
15
in here is a photograph of the site, Frosty's site description, the results
16 of the Livermore measurement,
Included
and also notes and maps; and I would hope
17
that you might pick out your favorite site and actually come and look at
18
this book--we will leave it up here--and perhaps get a feel for the type of
19
information that was available to us when we made the site selection.
20
There is also shown up here a larger map, so that you can look at it
21
without looking at the viewgraphs.
22
you'd care to study this.
23
The next viewgraph
24
We have several materials available, if
(LRA-53).
One of the recommendations of this
Committee was that we provide a sufficient number of sites that we could
25 make a comparison between our normal method of calculation of doses which
26
is based upon external exposure rate measurements.
27
based upon contemporary measurements of cesium in soil.
28
sites are included in Phase II in order to make that comparison.
196
This other method is
So that these 10