Although there is considerable spread

Mass- Loading Approach
The other approximate prediction

in these data, there is no indication of a

method is based upon measured or

preferential associaticn of 239, 2405,

assumed levels of particulate matter in

with a particular particle size; as would

ambient air with the assumption that this

be expected as a result of dilution by inert

materia! is derived from the contaminated

aerosol, the specific activity is lower

soil,

than that of the soil.

For fresh deposits this approach is

not valid because the freshly deposited

If we assume that this is generally

debris is much more iikely to be resus-

true, a generai and conservative.method

pended than the remainder of the

of predicting resuspended air concentra-

weathered soii surface,

After many

tions of contaminants would be to simply

years of weathering since the initial

multiply the ambient air mass loading by

deposition, however, the contaminating

the contaminant concentration in soil,

material should be reasonably well mixed

factor of some uncertainty for a specific

with a centimeter or two of soil, such

calculation is what value to use forthe

that the contaminant activity per gram of

ambient air mass loading in the absence

airborne particulate should approximate

of specific data,

that in the upper soil.

more uncertain because of the possibility

However, a major

A

This becomes even

difficulty could arise if, for example,

that the people involved may be highly

239, 2405, were preferentially associated

correlated with the source in the sense

with the smaller narticte sizes mare

that children plaving in sand. adultes enl-

likely to become airborne,

tivating crops, etc,, may generate their

For the

Nevada Test Site, such is not the case as

own "ambient air" which contains much

determined by soil analyses! 4 and by the

more mass than would be recorded bya

high-volume cascade impactor study.

remote stationary sampler,

The lower and upper bounds of ambient

The latter study found an AMAD of 3.0 wm
for 239, 240

air mass loading can be fixed rather

median aerodynamic diameter was 1.7 um,

easily for any site.

The specific activity of the material col-

siderable interest in establishing a

Pu, whereas the total mass

There has been con-

lected on each stage can also be examined

"background level" of mass loading, and

for a preferential association of plutonium

this is generally believed to be about

with particle size,

10 we/m 3 (5)

Average data from all

established in a reasonable way bythe

five samplers are:

239, 240 Pu,

Size, um
>7

950

3,3 to 7

700

2.0 to 3.3

1030

1,1 to 2.0

1300

0.01 to 1.1

480

All stages
(Soil)

|

The upper bound can be

890
(2700)

dpm/g

levels found in mine atmospheres which
have led to a considerable prevalence of
pneumoconiosis in the affected workers ©,
Examination of these data indicate that
current standards for occupationa! dust

exposure (~ 1-10 mg/m?) have a very
small, or perhaps no margin of safety,
such that a reasonable upper bound can

be taken as 1 mg/m°,

British data’

i11-24

Select target paragraph3