oe
_.
ae
ee
moceinn
aoe
wee
amg
‘oT NW
——e
eee
ee
|
=
—
—
—
a
a
—_
——
OBSERVATIONS
———
ee
ee
ee
Ll
|
———
.
eee
eee
eee
ee
a
———_
——
SE
eee
|
asm
cues ond
a
a
=_eD
a
Del
a
—
A
|
|
a
eee
a
oe
oe
_—ia
eee
ee
_—
_
“T
|
Zs
———
EE
wee
ESTIMATES OF
THYROID CANCER
INCIDENCE RISK
PER UNIT DOSE
og
my
fst
3
iy
re
orn
a,
Figure 1. Schematic of approach.
———-
—
he oe eee eee ee
OUTPUT FROM THIS STUDY
af EP oat Le Le Me
at
|
——
—_— ow ow
+ “yt
toy
EXPOSED
INTERNAL AND EXTERNAL THYROID DOSE ESTIMATES
ee
THYROIO
NOOULE AND
CANCER
STATISTICS
re
AGE ANO
V4.
INTAKE ESTIMATES FOR RADIOIOOINES AND RACIOTELLUAIUMS
FOR FOOD, &R, SKIN AND WATER PATHS PLUS ESTIMATES
OF CUMULATED EXTERNAL EXPOSURE
i
‘Sg
THYROID DOSE
l
UTIRIK ANDO SIFO ISLANDS PLUS
EXPOSURE RATE HISTORIES
ee
tare
T
RATE RESULTS
COMPOSITION OF FALLOUT AT RONGELAP
-
[um tem
RONGELAP
BIKIN] ASH
— ee ee
_
i
faMngt|
11,08
OBSERVATIONS
|
--
[Oars
FALLOUT
ADULT URINE
i-
|
—
a
=e
———
—
ooo