., i resuspension, i.e.; batch plant operation. .. I Occupational hazards aboun(i . .— ., \ .- . and”~ave-~een meitioned’in the ‘appropriateannex. I CONCLUSIONS .. . -------.,___ ..— ---. -----.-. . .-” ------....-.;. ... ... . . . . . . . . . . . ... .. .. -. .-.. .. . The RSAIT arrived at three conclusions of note. First, resuspension 1 ~ of plutonium has not been a problem and does net now appear to be a .. . operation. Second, the bulk haul of problem even at the 5a.tchphnt .: “. . contaminated soil is efficient and safe, and does not require any .,.-.. :.: ,. -? degree of radiation protection. extraordina.z.z ,“ ,. Third? occupational problem during this cleanup operation. hazards still tie tie predominant ,.., ... ~ .,. . .. . . .,.’ “,. .. ... :. ...., 1. There is no need for personnel to wear surgical face masks at Enjebi. . -- 2. . .. P.esgiratoryprotectio~ against plutonium is only logical at the time’earth is physically %ing transit. 3. moved about’,but not during water ,.. Cont3nued command emphasis on occupational safety and health is essential for the completion of this operational program. .,,..,:., ..~ -, .... . .... ... ..,. -.. , . 2