Table 3. Nean Sr ‘37Cs and ‘l” (pCi/g wet weiqht) Concentration —. ! c)~r 2.6 Milk 3.0 o.ong _.—. —— suGAR (LELE) AND TARE For all practical differences Several were taken main identified: ~~co, l~~cs, spectrum calculated relative Figure with decay of the samples occurred island, although between marked the east 250, and nuclides locations and and west only one also ‘07mRh. (Table foot Although scme ‘c2mRh where measured Each to a de~th exposure seen, exposure are but in the A wide in general rates. v~riation the amounts Figure 6 shows 500 tiR/hr background indicated rate c~r,ponent Of ~°F)!?u-Rh, the conct~ctrations exposure taken o; one to raze were the ~?:mRh to be present. nuclide analyzed on Eneman square background of each size. to the qamma of ‘3”~Cs was the end of Enema:? which 500 uF./hr respectivel.v. contained the projected were on the west its original of the sample amounts 7 gives emitting seen probably amount inversely the projected The are contributors assuming in the relative varied levels a~proximately Three were one at four 60, 100, were represented the gamma are abo!ut half inches. two these detonations is only samples backgrounds —.- 5). nuclear as a result ——— —— (ENEMP.N) pur~oses in background (Figure sample .— —. ——.. Meat Soil CoccndT: i37c~ Sample ends in $erokoi at T (Jul!/ 1969). as a .functio~ of time. by radiochemical methods area. Two for alpha 4). 14 :%L5!5!J= Xq -7----------- ‘i,