Table
3.
Nean
Sr
‘37Cs and ‘l”
(pCi/g wet weiqht)
Concentration
—.
! c)~r
2.6
Milk
3.0
o.ong
_.—.
——
suGAR
(LELE) AND TARE
For all practical
differences
Several
were
taken
main
identified:
~~co,
l~~cs,
spectrum
calculated
relative
Figure
with
decay
of the samples
occurred
island,
although
between
marked
the east
250,
and
nuclides
locations
and
and west
only
one
also
‘07mRh.
(Table
foot
Although
scme
‘c2mRh
where
measured
Each
to a de~th
exposure
seen,
exposure
are
but
in the
A wide
in general
rates.
v~riation
the amounts
Figure
6 shows
500 tiR/hr background
indicated
rate
c~r,ponent Of
~°F)!?u-Rh, the conct~ctrations
exposure
taken
o; one to
raze were
the ~?:mRh
to be present.
nuclide
analyzed
on Eneman
square
background
of each
size.
to the qamma
of ‘3”~Cs was
the
end of Enema:? which
500 uF./hr respectivel.v.
contained
the projected
were
on the west
its original
of the sample
amounts
7 gives
emitting
seen
probably
amount
inversely
the projected
The
are
contributors
assuming
in the relative
varied
levels
a~proximately
Three
were
one
at four
60, 100,
were
represented
the gamma
are
abo!ut half
inches.
two
these
detonations
is only
samples
backgrounds
—.-
5).
nuclear
as a result
———
——
(ENEMP.N)
pur~oses
in background
(Figure
sample
.—
—. ——..
Meat
Soil
CoccndT:
i37c~
Sample
ends
in $erokoi
at T
(Jul!/ 1969).
as a .functio~ of time.
by radiochemical
methods
area.
Two
for alpha
4).
14
:%L5!5!J=
Xq
-7-----------
‘i,