Livermore's reply from Gerry Johnson, to DMA on 26 Jan. began by stating that Z 2 reese yey the Willow and the outerspace test had to be treated separately since the objectives of Willow are high altitude effects and weapons test evaluation, whereas the objectives of the outerspace test are to develop a capability within the AEC's labs for such testing. He cites Hertford's letter to Starbird on 17 Nov. 59 as representing Livermore's feelings about the AEC's participation in the Willow test. As for the outerspace test, Livermore disagrees with the division of responsibility set forth sy Starbird since the development of any testing capability is a responsibility of the \EC and the military participation would appear in its appropriate place as one of che support elements. F di not Z & bury andd did on 26 Jan.came from Brad osal prop 's bird Star to y The LASL repl vith theDOD. i n wi i tio munica Starbird's proposals for com of some h wit ngly stro as disagree . , urgting g the about the organii zational.format i simistic pes was he said r eve how ry Bradbu i g that an umber i g the feelin i , and expressin ing fir and ing fus r ove l AEC to retain contro cal objectives of of the system and the techni e sid cal hni tec the of s of the detail future. to be worked out in the the operation would have fan. 60 memo (COPB 4518, Rev. I) from E. A. Boyrie discusses cable requirements CW’ Succotash and shows the expanded concept of the program, which now includes (and planning for all 3 of i j k tunnels), CHIFFON in Ul2e.03, BUTLER in U12b.09, YWHIP in Ul2e.07, and MARSHMALLOW in U12e.01. . cy