2

WORLDWIDE EFFECTS OF ATOMIC WEAPONS

necesPrevious estimates of the number of bombsor of thetotal yield
inned
contai
have
effects
erm
long-t
and
cale
sary to produce such large-s
in
wns
unkno
cal
biologi
and
l
physica
herent uncertainties because of the
effects
their
and
ts
produc
the complicated history of radioactive fission
ance in
on man. These uncertainties did not seem to beof critical import
tably
comfor
d
the past because the minimum estimates of yield require
with
exceeded the total yield of nuclear weaponsdetonated to date. Now,
ing
increas
s
world’
the
of
e
becaus
and
the advent of high-yield bombs
less
is
but
large
still
is
es
stockpile, the margin over the early estimat
inties by a
clearly definable. It is most desirable to lessen these uncerta
an effort
concerted attack on the problem. Project SUNSHINE” represents
fields
by RAND with the support of many of the leaders in the appropriate
experit
explici
an
t
waytha
of science to formulate the problem in such a
ry for a
mental program may be undertaken to provide the facts necessa
more reliable estimate of this large-scale hazard.

INTRODUCTION AND CONCLUSIONS

3

(a2) Products dependent on the composition and nature of the device
itself.

(4) Induced activities dependent on burst environment.
Project GABRIEL concluded that the most dangerous radioactive product
is strontium 90 (Sr°°), one of the most abundantly formed products of a
fission reaction. Later studies by the Atomic Energy Commission's Division
of Biology and Medicine corroborate the identification of Sr°° as the most
important long-range contaminant. These conclusions were established
mainly as a result of the following properties of Sr°°:
1, A nuclear detonation will produce 1 gram (gm) of Sr°° per kiloton (KT) of yield energy, or 20 gm per 20-KT “nominal” bomb.

This is a considerable quantity.

2. Its physical half-life is long-—20 years.

3. It possesses a long biological half-life because of its bone-seeking
property.

4. Body ingestionis high.

THE LONG-RANGE RISKS
has
Man, in his development of more “efficient” means of waging war,

s. Now, in
often increased the incidence of casualties to noncombatant
-type casualatomic warfare, there exist means forinflicting noncombative
Le., through
s,
weapon
of
ties long after the detonation of a number
radiative damage.
ate effects
The hazards existing near ground zero following the immedi

l radiation;
of a nuclear detonation consist mainly in exposure to externa
The main
reports.
weapon
many
these hazards are covered in detail in

tive debris that,
concern of SUNSHINE is to examine the hazards of radioac

thereby
by one means or another, finds a way into a human being and

may be
becomes a source of internal radiation damage, this latter hazard

expresent in relatively local areas of the earth or may be spread more
man.
of
ce
commer
pesivel eatiralthrough the

device can
The radioactive debris resulting from the burst of a nuclear

be classified as follows:
“short-range” evaluations of
*Project SUNSHINE is to be distinguished from the separate
effects.
fallout
e
close-in, short time-scal

Project SUNSHINE has further concluded that the manner of production
peculiar to this contaminant suggests that it will be readily available for
incorporation into the biosphere.
Consequently, at the present writing, we concur that Sris the principal
long-range, possibly worldwide, contaminant. Studies are being continued

to determine whether or not any other products under both (a) and (4)
above may present a biological hazard comparableto or larger than that
of Sr°°. Possible substances may be certain isotopes that are formed in

fairly large quantities in thermonuclear bursts.

For lack of data, several problems are not discussed in this preliminary
report but are the subject of current study. They include the problem of
what role the hydrosphere may have in the disposal of radioactive contaminants, the effects of the contaminant on life in the hydrosphere, and
human dependence on its products. The proposed sampling program is
this aspect of the problem.

Another problem is ecological in nature. It asks the question, What is
the effect on other forms of life as a result of the decrease in population
of a given biological form through the action of Sr°°?

Select target paragraph3