oe
e
ee
fi
we
cleanup phases of the program.
(DEIS, Vol. I, pp.
5-73,
6-5) Even
*
mt
ale
ndar 3S
Cu
oer
tT
*
ow
J
if the Task Group is enlarged as we have suggested and specific
A
developed an@ implemented,
this monitoring ore
arc
et
will perform a crucial function.
we
ee
ety Satcet
fF. =
aa
we
vty
aly
a
am
hn
-
Thus, it is important that its
muomoersnip be carefully selected.
It is imper ative that radio-
scientists of the most conservative cast be inciuded in the
—
monitoring group.
Here again, we suggest that the names of Drs.
Me
Martell, Geesdman, Tamplin and Cochran.
tal Corn
As
ate aa
The ie 8
_And the on-site authority of the nonitoLing group Should be
clearly defined, with all important or unexpected problems to be
referred to the enlarged Task Group.
/
ene
3.6. Test Plantings, Groundwater and Air Sampling
We are
in
full
agreement with
the AEC Task
Tw. Ay
be feke
Group recommenda-
je
e?
tions for test plantings, lens water and air sampling.
pp. 5-80 to 5-81.)
(vol. - yo
But it is not clear whether these recommendaa-
tions have been implemented.
They must be and the studies should
be commissioned to the best scientists and technicians available,
under the over-all guidance of the enlarged Task Group.
2
All of
ean oe c™ ‘oe
these studies must deal explicitly with the hot particle problem.
3.7. Radiobiological Health Followup
AEC Task Group recommendation 12
(Vol. I, p.
5-81)
calls for
"Baseline surveys of body burdens and urine content of Cs-137 and
Sr-90...
for the Enewetak people prior to return to Enewetak Atoll,
and periodically thereafter."
But here, too, it is not clear
whether a firm commitment to long-range radiological health
monitoring of the Enewetak population has becn made, and, if so,
‘ese
Dagee
eae
Dh ight aed Fae Rig
s..
Ms. ot
7 :
.
os pein 2
—
vibts
ik ee
ey i= ao
reptts 2
4 aiXp
faga
4s
hes
eRe
‘, uated
Ae
oy