©@
.
)
AQ1LBOB
7) —Oond
;
& April 195%
Mr, Merril Eisenbud
New York
rations Office
Ue Se A
o Energy Comission
Pe O. Box 30
Ansonia Station
New York
23
ae
BEST COPY AVAILABLE
Ye
Dear MF Eisenbud 8
Two 26 hour urine collections were made for
analysis
at the NY0O Iaboratory. Thefirst collection was completed
ana shipped on 2% Marche The second collection was sede
completed on 25 March and shipment was made on 29 Marche
The {dontificetion mark on each urine bottle consists
The urine has been collected,
acidified, Oo
he» and
shipped to all interested laboratories,
RD L
ani
Los Alamos ) by Lt. We H Chapman (
USE and
Lt(§g)R. Sharp (M3C)USN. I am confident that all urine
was handled in an identical manner and that interlaboratory
comparisons should be reasonable and would give different
tines to evaluate excr:tion ratese
Chickens shipped to NRDL have shown ighly significant
internal deposition as shown by radig atographse
Preliminary report on urine from Log “Alamos indicates
present of plu
niume
- =rik
REVIEWER [ADD):
Previous dispatch on dates of collection was accidentally
in error.
WAME:
The accompanying Meet contain the total urine volumes
collected on 24% and 25 march.
By:
25 march and terminated
DEPART“ENT OF ENER GY DECLASSI
hour collection was begun on
16 march for patient number 45e)
FICATION REVIEW
DETERMINATION iCJACLE NUMBER
(3))
1. CLASSIFICAT ROM RETAIN 0
2. CLASSI IAT ON CHANGE D TO:
NS NO DOE CLASSHIED INFO
4. COORD: NATE WITH:
FICATION CANCELED
(ED INFO GRACKETED
patients name, the Gate.of collection, and the
elinical numbers ( F
indicates
{ SINGLE R EVIEW AUTHORIZED
of the
tbe
a
It would be appreeiated if studies were made on excretion
of bones seekers and if this project, through CJTFe7,
could be regularly
informed of s tus on urine 8
sis
80 we can logically
plan subsequent studies.
products and long term follow up studies of «
personne}.
‘ 00 10 47
Sincere
IE oR
eee...
oe
4Shlo
¢,
:
Bug
erred
FOOTBieage
teaoad
an
| FaPO Perr ‘wee
Somer wee want =
vg Mace a Te YW
7
at
|
pe
-
nT cHa
te’
_