22

ing on their homeisland was small, it was decided
to allow the people to return.
CONCLUDING REMARKS

The increasingly widespread uses of radioactive sources in research andindustry increase the
possibility of exposure of people to various forms of
ionizing radiation. Therefore, greater knowledge
of such effects on humanbeingsis badly needed.
Considerable research is being carried out on effects of radiation on animals, but there are obvious

limitations in extrapolating such data to the human species. Human experimentation, particularly with regard to whole-body radiationeffects,
is limited to therapeutic use of radiation in diseased people. Though such data are useful, they
must be evaluated with caution. The most valuable information about human radiation effects,

therefore, has come from people irradiated from
atomic bombs such as the Japanese people of
Hiroshima and Nagasaki and the Marshallese,
from a few isolated laboratory accidents, and from
individuals having ingested radium. The group of
irradiated Marshallese people offers a most valuable source of data on human beings who have
sustained injury from all the possible modesof exposure—penetrating radiation, beta radiation ofthe
skin, and internal absorption of radioactive materials. The acute and subacuteeffects of these different forms of exposure have been well documented and for the most part have subsided. Even
though,as pointed out, the radioactive contamina-

tion of Rongelap Island is considered perfectly

safe for human habitation, the levels of activity

are higher than those found in other inhabited
locations in the world. The habitation of these
people on the island will afford most valuable
ecological radiation data on humanbeings. Since
only small amountsofisotopes are necessary for
tracer studies, the various radioisotopes present
can be traced from the soil, through the food
chain, and into the humanbeing, wherethetissue
and organ distribution, biological half-lives, and

excretion rates can be studied. Such investigations
will be done by the use of whole-body gammaspec-

troscopy of the people and of sample materials,
and by radiochemical analysesof soil, food, and

human excreta.

e

P23

cc

CF

Several factors favorably influence these studies
on the Marshallese. The exposed and unexposed

Rongelap people are interrelated and represent a
remarkably homogeneous population. Theylive

underthe same environmental, sociological, and

economic conditions and are likely to remaintogether as a group indefinitely. As contrasted with
the Japanese, the dose of gammaradiation received
is reasonably well established. Also in contrast to
the Japanese, these people have been subjected to
only minimal psychic and no physical trauma.
In view of these facts, continued medical sur-

veys of the Marshallese people are anticipated on
an annual basis.

Summary
Results are reported of a medical survey on the

Marshallese people exposed to radioactive fallout
three years previously. Examinations were carried out at Majuro in the Marshall Islands on 82
people from Rongelap who had been exposed to
the heaviest fallout and on a comparison population of unexposed Rongelap people matchedfor
age and sex. A Navy LST wasused for the second
phase of the examinations to examine 144 people
of Utirik Island whoreceived the least fallout.
The survey showedthatall the irradiated Marshallese people were makingsatisfactory recovery
from their radiation exposure. Thefollowingis a
summaryofthe findings on the Rongelap people.
ACUTE AND SUBACUTE EFFECTS
Penetrating radiation

Diseases. In general the incidenceofdisease, in-

fectious and noninfectious, was about the samein

the exposed as in the unexposed group. No symptomswere present that could berelated to radiation effects. Several interesting findings were noted
in both the irradiated and unirradiated groups:
the incidence of congenital anomalies was high;
peptic ulcer and psychic disturbances wererare;
the incidence of dental caries was very high; and
intestinal parasitism was widespread.
Nutrition. Nutrition appeared to be as good in
the exposed as in the unexposed groups.
Growth and development. In the exposed children
from about 4 through 9 years of age there was a

slight lag in bone maturation (based on x-ray
studies of the left wrist), and these children were

Select target paragraph3