-
desiccation,
WN
died from thermal burns vecause they burned their “rudder”
Ww
off and they weren't able to fly.
F-
sometimes arrive at a reagonable solution of things that
ww
eee
So these birds died of destecation?
are happening.
on
CONARD:
Did those birds die in one day?
DONALDSON:
Yes,
wo
11
DONALDSON:
i2
FREMONT-SMITEH:
13
14
21
a2
It seems iike it's @pretty quick death,
’
I wasn't clear what your con-
¢lusion was,
DONALDSON:
Desiccation, because the burns weren't
there,
|
UPTON:
But the burns prevented them from feeding, -
DONALDSON:
Yes, it's the cause and effect relation-
ship.
|
UPTON:
They couldn't eat and therefore they
couldn't maintain their food balance,
DONALDSON:
24
ROOT:
25
26
29
30
They dried out fast.
cation or from thermal burns?
23
27
28
But it'a terribly hot.
DUNHAM: Did you decide these fish died from desic-
19
20
These pictures were made on sub-
sequent days,
CONARD:
17
18
So you can by elimination
Now, if I may have just.another minute or two,
10
15
16
No, they
This wag obvious in the autopsy, too,
DONALDSON:
CONARD:
Yes.
Yes,
Could this have been anorexia from radi-
ation, loss of appetite so that they didn’t want to eat any
fish?
BRUES:
This is the old problem that the pathologists
and the epidemiologists have,
31
DONALDSON:
32
PREMONT-SMITH:
33
DONALDSON:
What 1s the cause of death?
That's right.
Multiple causality enters into it.
Surely.
Multiple causes that,Sialicvc Warten
DOEJUCLA /*