Table ic, HASL # Fallout data for May 1956 rain water collections. Site # 383k 3835 1 1 3836 3838 6 3640 36) 8 9 3839 Total Activity* (me/mi?/mo) West Newton, Mass. West Newton, Mass. 2 3837 Sampling Site amp’ ing 220 130 Medford, Ore. 21 “* 2,3 ‘Tampa, Fla. Ly 1.9 &zores 7 + 2.5 #1.3 110 Hatteras, N. C. +3 4.3 + 1.2 Charleston, S. C, Greenville, S.C. 5.6 #1.1 Te7 + O09 38h2 10 West Palm Beach, Fla, 23 #11 38h5 15 Lake Charles, La. ll +1.1 3847 3818 21 2, Red Bluff, Cal. Jacksonville, Fla. 17. 20 #1.1 #1.2 Burlington, Vt. 1k + 14 Montoursville, Pa. dkron, Ohio 16 39 #101 + 3.9 28 = 3.8 3843 11 3846 Tallahassee, Fla, 17. 3849 ‘Nashville, Tenn. 25 3850 3851 3852 8.1714 26 27. 28 5.2 + 1.6 Nantucket, Mass, Caribou, Me. Albany, N. Y. ae Lf. _- 0.55 + 0.023 1.2 40,19 33 0 3.4 + 0.28 0.21 # 0.18 10.0 + 3.8 0.77 ¥ 0.15 0.85 + 0.13 0,86 + 0.11 1.1 + 0.11 1h + 023 ll #021 0.63 * 0,20 19 1.8 #0.30 3858 3859 47? 59 Bismark, N. D. Fresno, Cal. 13 25 #1.6 41.2 1.2 + 0.17 ll * 0.17 3861 61 Scottsdluff, Neb. 15 + 2.8 1.5 4 0.35 3863 63 3860 3862 386), 3865 Grand Island, Web. 60 Roanoke, Va. 62 Yakima, Wash, ~ 8.1 + 0.7 13 Tatoosh Island, Wash, 66 67 Stephenville, Newf, Laredo, Texas 41.6 5.4 + 0,62 7.6 + 0.80 2 17. 41.3 ¥ 2.3 6.9 0.6 2.9 9.5 10 Madison, Wis; 4) 58 1.1 # 0.13 2.4 + 0.57 32 3857 0 2.0 17 1.5 + 0.17 1.1 40,12 1,1 # 0.12 2h 0.96 0,81 > 0.17 23 #1,2 9.0 + 0,6 22 *1.0 3856 Indianapolis, Ind. 0 11 0 Vy 29 30 31 926 1.4 + 0.18 1.0 # 0.17 3853 385) 3855 Sr (me/mi</mo) 3.1 40.56 0.56 + 0,095 0.59 + 0.17 0.52 4 0.10 O49 + 0.099 1.9 #0.18 5.1 * 0.38 6.6 5.7 11 18 5.0 18 8.5 5.2 21 11 Q 2.9 9.0 0 % Total “ Activity Combing Date: dugost 23, 1956, 2& Sr°9 extrapolated to first day of sampling month, » & = 4 o = ~~ ~ ~ SARS ~ ~s “ ad She, aes