Oe

Hy S

OG in £

ourr lecir

A = voper left loin

B = Upper rignt loin .
C = Lower rignt loin
D = Lower ieft loin

A minimum of 10 cans were filled from each loin witn the cans being

numbered 1 to 10 to represent progression from head to tail.

Cans #10 and

#9 were from the tail section and cans #6 to #1 were from the head and body

section.
Code

Total

Cans Numbered

A

13

1525253535 596571859,10,10

B

12

1,2,353,h5h5556,72859510

C

10

152539 55565748,9,10

D

ii

1,25 3535455,6,7,8,9,10

Total L6 cans
;

Far analysis of tne canned meat, samplcs.were taken from the coded

cans in suth a way that meat from (1) near the head, (2) at mid section and
(3) néar the tail was represented.

Far control 1951 and 195) pack was used with samples representative

- of Pacific. Yellow fin and itlantic Coast "little" tuna.
.

Radiolegival analyses.

Wet weight samples ranring from approximately 3 to 0 grams were

placed in 100 mi. pyrex beakers and ashed at 500°C for 2h hours.

Ash

weights were rccorded and the aSh broken up into a fine powder and distributed
as evenly as possible | over 10 ml. capacity aluminum "milk top" planchettes,
having a diameter of 5 centimeters. Samples were rcad for 10 minutes. Values
were correetcd for background and expressed as disintegrations per minutc.
Standard Basis: U.S. Bureau of Standards. Beta Ray Standard. RaD/E #1162

corrected to ,ugust 1, 1954, = 127.8 d/sec.

In three experiments, counts per minute wore read against increments

of ash weight. Within the rangé of ash weights recorded, this relationship
‘was shown to be linear. No corrections for self-absorption were con-

sequently. made.

2

Select target paragraph3