52
5.
DISCUSSION
The
report
conclusions
are
from
AND RECOHHENDATIONS
(a)
quite
soil
reached
and
the
The
straightforward.
and
issues
vegetation
raised
dose
externally,
by
received
and
(b)
the
is
from
body
due
the
of
to
this
radiations
food
eaten.
/’---)
The
review
The
whole-body
theirs;
has
rem.
dose
for
(DOE-1982
shown
the
and
red
marrow
are
that
erestimated
now
reported
ours)
I conclude
thaf’DOE-l
it
well
(1.25
is
40%
below
a return
rem,
to
30-year)
(1.34
the
the
is
rem).
current
residence
1978
one-half
Both
U.S.
P
la
adultise.
sets
of
values
whole-body
on Rongelap
/7
of
guide
Island
of
5
is
permissible.
(The
later,
5.1
doses
would
be
Living
about
the
report
are
for
The
1978.
current
dose,
10 years
20% less.)
simple
conditions
leaving
in
former
one
(a)
purchased
as
(b)
Special
this
Assumptions
Within
that
in
on return
1985.
and
when
In particular,
thus
the
much money
Food
on
should
should
supply
addition,
Assistance
be
the
be
the
was
ship
would
return
the
meet
food consumed
The
In
statement
in
Program,
diet
part
available
should
raised
at
received
which
tacit
to
those
be
equivalent
assumptions.
prior
to
to
the
conditions.
locally,
regular
now as
but
several
equivalent
following
visited
families
are
intervals.
was
available
foods
has
but
only
also
I assume
then.
distributed
one
was
by the
more year
to
USDA
go.