34
4.2
Internal
Dose
~
Lawrence
into
-
Livernore
body by ingestion
the
applying
appropriate
in
The particular
rem.
precisely
what
To be
i.e.,
one
factors
it
on the
involving
food
(Note
it
commented
that
the
in
fact
it
was more
overestimation
dose
of
calculations
The
1978
pigs
1981a,
and
of
98 fish,
In
1986,
analyzed
independently.
smaller
available?)
et
represented
a person
and in
agreement
the
coconut,
on
1988),
the
Naidu
in
food
al
in
the
and
per
day),
and
then
to
obtain
the
dose
Table
diet--no
also
(1980)
4.2
#1.
one
knows
eat.
a greater
not
This
Livermore
input
who originally
prepared,
could
activities
(Robison
contributing
given
lies
The Lawrence
specific
1982b).
remarkable
are
.
went
eaten
group
described
food,
results
of
and
that
in
that
used
it
for
concurred.
made on 21 samples
-2
diet
dose.
used
(exposure)
what
attempts
have been made to define
several
.—.
—....—_ ~—””
-—.-2-.
/-’‘WE-1982
chose
the BNL community
B diet,
11).
than
input
‘\
/
amount of
a greater
by determining
(picocuries
uncertainty
side,
contaminated
such
I have
although
safe
problem
inhalation
to
ones
is,
the
and
The major
Ingestion.
it.
attacked
major
independent
for
the
measured
5 of
whole
1987
this
Pandanus,
a barely
however,
the
results,
the
Livermore
of
number
took
in
data
and
reasonably
(Expand
1 chicken,
(Robison
some
Table
cesium
were
additional
collected
summarized
(?)
team
breadfruit,
adequate
also
exposure
confirmation.
Livermore
1 of
Laboratory
project
The
part
by the
on
this
good
al,
samples
which
4.2
the
et
#2,
were
show
foods
agreement
when more
data
for
P2
$A
4