The additional information we have already from the survey is that Enyu island is perfectly safe from all standpoints. Crops grown on Enyu are safe to eat. Houses built anywhere on Enyu are safe to live in. And there would be no constraints, we know of no constraints or conditions that need to be placed on people that would live on Enyu island permanently. For that reason we have suggested that consideration be given to changing the impetus, the growth of Bikini Atoll, the development of Bikini Atoll, shifting the emphasis of growth to Enyu at this time. Not withdrawing from Bikini, unless it becomes just inconvenient for people to live on Bikini. We don't say that for safety reasons people not live on Bikini. We say that we think a better community, a more complete community and one that will be much more compatible with the lifestyle of the people can be done on Enyu. Two more points I'd like to make: All of the fish, all the food from the lagoon, are safe to eat. No radiation levels of any consequences are in the fish products at Bikini Atoll. The point I'd like to be sure to make is that it is our intention, regardless of what decisions are made about the repopula‘tion of Bikini island, it is our intention to continue research, to study, monitoring and surveillance of that island and of Enyu for that matter and of the people to be assured that these recommendations we make continue to be valid. We do intend .a long term program to try to learn how to raise crops on Bikini island without them having high levels of radiation. And we think there are very good possibilities that that will materialize. We are committed, we ERDA are committed, to a long term program of study, research, and surveillance and as you know Dr. Conard and his medical team have been conducting surveillance and monitoring of people at Rongelap and recently at Bikini. They will continue that. Should there be any evidence of radiation appearing in the diet, they'll know it before it can be of any cc nsequence or damage to the people. Dr. Conard has reported his surveys of people who have been living there now for a couple of years that he has found no Significant radiation levels in those people. That they have not been in any sort of hazardous condition. Have I missed anything? **(did not mention in this meeting about the restriction on Enyu well water. This was later corrected - by TWX to Distad DeBrum. See Attachment C). Distad that's a summary and we would welcome any questions from anyone. Ekpap: In your summary you concentrate on only two islands, Bikini and Enyu Islands. What happened to the rest of of the islands? Should the people decide to go there and pick pandanus and breadfruit would they be safe? Ray: In the recommendations that were made before the cleanup and resettlement of Bikini, it's indicated, I believe, that most of those islands are free for visitation. Visiting, collecting birds eggs, fishing and so forth. There's been one misunderstanding about that which came to me in questions addressed to the Distad. It said that people should not stay more than 24 hours on one of those islands. That I think is a misunderstanding of what was intended. What was intended is that people not take up permanent residence on those islands. But in saying that we feel that it's perfectly safe for people to be on Enyu and for people to be on Bikini. Included in the calculations that result in that statement is the understanding that people will visit those other islands. Dr. Gudiksen has incorporated in his analysis of what we think is a reasonable amount of time that people might expect in terms of hours a day, hours a week visiting, picnicing, collecting and so forth. The other islands are not suitable for residency at this time but they're certainly suitable for visiting. Have I answered that?