29 city of vital statistics in the Marshallese and the small numbers of people involved. Nodiseases, infectious or noninfectious, have developed which could be related directly to radiation effects. The incidenceof diseases in the exposed people noted during the 4-year survey, as in previous surveys, remained about the same as found in the unexposed comparison population. A limited survey of immune responses of the exposed groupat 3 years post-exposure® showed that the antibody response to tetanus antigenic stimulus was notsignificantly differentfrom the response in the unexposed group. Three deaths have occurred in the exposed people. Thefirst was in a 46-yr-old man whodied of hypertensive heart disease 1 year post-exposure. He had had thedisease at the timeof irradiation. The second occurred in a 78-yr-old man at 2 years post-exposure. He was a diabetic of long standing and died apparently of coronary heart disease. A third occurred in April 1958, after the present survey, in a 35-yr-old man from the groupthat received 69 r, due to pneumonia complicating a severe case of chickenpox. In noneofthese cases was there any direct evidence that death was due to radiation exposure. Lag in recovery of some of the peripheral blood elements of the exposed people over the 4-year period since exposure is in sharp contrast to the much morerapid recovery seen in animal studies, but generally conformsto the recovery pattern seen in the Japanese exposed at Hiroshima and Nagasaki. In the Marshallese the myelocytic series showed earliest recovery (by | year post-exposure), with lymphocytes and platelets exhibiting much slower recovery. The present hematological exam- examined by comparing differences between the mean peripheral blood elementlevels of this group and the corresponding group of unexposed women with differences between levels in exposed and un- exposed menof the sameage group. Nosignificant differences were seen. It might be questioned whether or not the present low body burden of radionuclides might contribute to delayed recovery of hemopoietic function. Admittedly little is known of possible effects of such low level exposure on the marrow, particularly if, as in the case of the Marshallese, a significant dose of penetrating radiation has been previously received. However,it is not believed that the small amountof additional radiation imposed on the marrow from this source would be sufficient to retard hemopoietic recovery. Hematological examination at 3 years postexposure revealed a drop in the mean leukocyte counts compared with 2-year levels in both the exposed and unexposed people. The possibility was considered that a population trend downward in leukocyte counts was occurring such as has been © seen in Japan.*’ However, this does not seem to be the case, since leukocyte levels this year are not further depressed compared with previous levels. The acute effects of the beta irradiation of the skin subsided rapidly, and only 12 cases still show residual scarring and pigment abberation.It is possible that the acute stage of the beta burns may have caused some of the fluctuation observed in the white blood cell count. In those showing epilation, complete regrowth of hair occurred by 6 months post-exposure. No acute effects of the internal absorption of radionuclides were observed. inations reveal that the meanleukocyte level has virtually recovered to the control level, but more individuals had lower counts than in the unexposed group. Thrombocyte productionstill does not appear to have recovered completely as evidenced by the lower meanlevels in the exposed people both individually and as a group. As has seen, but certain of the more fundamental of these peripheral blood level of these elements has not impaired in any observable waytheir resistance to disease. The 3 deaths that have occurred in the exposed population do not appearto indicate a higher mortality rate than seen in the comparison popu- whetherthereis a lowered reserve hemopoietic capacity in the marrow of the exposed people. The effect of the natural stresses of childbearing and menstruation in women 15 to 45 years of age was that someof the higher estimates oflife shortening per roentgen may be too high. Premature aging'®:*? is difficult to assess. From observations over the past 4 years the impressionis been pointed out, however, the slightly lower There has been considerable speculationas to LATE EFFECTS Late effects of radiation exposure have not been effects that have been observed in animals and to a lesser extent in man will be mentionedin relation to the Marshallese. Shortening oflife span**-*? has not been evident. lations. From these observations it would appear

Select target paragraph3