This document ce“sists of otpages

No

\

/

of

Navy DEPARTMENT

et

JOINT CROSSROADS COMMITTEE

17 January 1947

Wasaincton 25, D. C.

22% Jjopies

AQGAT 1

SIUPISECEET— ~—NCLASSIFIED

SE

X

Doctor Wright Langhem

:

P.O. Box 1665
Sante Fe, New Mexico
Dear Wright:

Joe Nolan has gotten togethtr a group of

CROSSROADS photographs which have been released for public

views, and these were forwarded on to you today.
Therefore, you should probably receive them even before this
letter since no problems of delivery are involved.

In going through the safe in the main
CROSSROADS office they discovered a copy of the section
of our report dealing with the neutron flux.
This copy
was supposed to have been delivered to you by courier in
September and I must apologize for such a bad foul-up.
I am now enclosing it along with a copy of a

Checlon CRoS

COLLECTION

t

BOX No.

“Th S3S4-

\

Peas

graph showing the variation with distances for slow neutrons.
The points used on this graph were carefully
selected to make sure no shielding of any sort existed
and their accurate locations on the ships were used in
computing the distances.
As you will see, they agree
quite closely with the predicted equation of Hirschfelder

f

CAB
nepositonyOS Abn 5 kLi

However,

and Magee.

In anelyzing these neutron results, w have
raised a few questions.
We have put them to Doctor
Dessauer and he is checking them, but I wondered if perhaps
you or some one at Los Alamos could also help us out.
The
first point involves the question whether the Sulphur pills
are measuring all the fast neutrons which are of physiélogical importance.
Since the minimum energy of the
neutrons captured by the Sulphur is between two and three
Mev and since it is our impression that a number of the

- fast neutrons of physiological significance are in the
energy range between 1/10 and 2 Mev, we thought our
a values might be considerably in error. Would it be possible
6 to obtain the energy distribution of the fast neutrons which

OS actually get out of the bomb?

Another point involves the

“ question of whether we are using the proper cross-section
for wr TENCEASSIRED Esad since they may in prectice be

Ciaesifieation chan¥é
ee
by Authority of tid

ons with energies greater than the

tragen PARP Cummiission,

’

teONDradiNeeeee.
(afc bd Eeseatis, eee gl abenuge in Clos.ie wal)

(Sasnateec
DPpepsoaBia

uu

ero,
aai

.

easeee

(wate).

lL

=

Select target paragraph3