The first and most obvious action appears to be to exclude men
from the contaminated areas and second, to exclude animals which
contribute to his food supply directly.

Since the area is not in

cultivation, a recommendation for some positive action is not
needed, and a recommendation to maintain it in its present uncultivated state is the equivalent of no action.

Exclusion of men
the exporeducing
and grazing animals will provide for not only
sure of men and prevent a Pu contribution to his food supply, but
will undoubtedly also decrease the amount of Pu carried with
surface materials into the atmosphere.

This will occur because

there will be a reduction in the amounts of smaller Pu-bearing
The small
particles carried into the atmosphere from this cause.
particle disturbance contribution to atmospheric movement would
undoubtedly also be reduced.
It has to be recognized that some provisions must be made to

carry out this exclusion for a very long time if the half-life of
Pu isotopes are taken into consideration.

It is difficult to

conceive that this is a serious problem in light of present
conditions.

NTS is an arid region with little potential for food

production above the minimal need for a few families,

and the

possibility of population pressures from our culture seem remote
as long as large-scale irrigation is not feasible.

Moreover, we

appear to be at a point of decreasing population pressures due to
a decreasing birthrate.

Even with population pressures, the

areas required would scarcely be significant from overall produc-

tivity.

If the area continues into the future to be considered

as a grazing area, which seems its greatest potential at present,
there may be some positive benefits to exclude plots from grazing
whether or not they are contaminated because these areas may
serve as seed production and distribution centers.

Overgrazing

is at present a common problem in much of the Western United
States, particularly in the more arid regions.

Exclusion areas

might in fact serve also as sites for maintaining native species

of animals as well, principally, small mammals and birds.

Wild

horses and burros should be excluded because of the physical
disturbance caused by these animals.

Antelope and deer might be

allowed access if the surrounding area is not overgrazed and the

175

Select target paragraph3