TABLE 2. REFERENCES AND STUDY SETES FOR DATA PLOTTED IN FIGURE 5. STTES WERE CHOSEN TO REPRESENT A VARIETY OF LOCATIONS. 18 |-—- —-\-4 PulOHs* 49 a 3 ae oe —— —.-____-] PufOH)>* pyat 20 — 4 5 7 6 7 N 8 — a nm ” Bartelt etal 1974 tw . U-Pond, Hanford (Wa. ) Emery et 1976 -_ . Maxey Flats (Ky.) Unpublished* Maxey Flats (Ky.) Unpub1 ished* Seawater TAEA** Windscale (U.K.) Heatherington eta} 1976 Lake Michigan Wahlgren et al 1976 Bombay Harbor (India) Pillai and Mathew, 1976 Pacific Ocean Miyake etal 1976 Enewetak Atoll] Noshkin eta]1976 Los Alamos Hakonson et al 1976 ORNL (Burial Ground) Bondietti, Rocky Flats (Colo.) Johnson ,1974 1976 *Trench water samples, commercial radioactive waste burial ground. Reynolds, ORNL, personal conmunication. **IAEA intercal libration sample (IAEA-SW-I-3) taken nearshore to an 9 10 pH Fig. 4. Estimated concentrations of hydrolyzed Pu(IV¥) species in solutions saturated with crystalline Pu, (Baes and Mesmer, 1976). 460 Miamt River (Ohio) mn . VA AKPulOH)s Lf Bondietti, 1976 n . oO Pu (OH), 4 (oq) in Oak Ridge, Tn. (WOL) ws \ Investigator/Source wo \6 Study Site ew -log CONCENTRATIONS (moles/liter) Figure Code unspecified nuclear facility. §. A.