TABLE 2. REFERENCES AND STUDY SETES FOR DATA PLOTTED IN FIGURE 5.
STTES WERE CHOSEN TO REPRESENT A VARIETY OF LOCATIONS.
18 |-—-
—-\-4
PulOHs*
49
a
3
ae oe
——
—.-____-]
PufOH)>*
pyat
20
—
4
5
7
6
7
N
8
—
a
nm
”
Bartelt etal 1974
tw
.
U-Pond, Hanford (Wa. )
Emery et 1976
-_
.
Maxey Flats (Ky.)
Unpublished*
Maxey Flats (Ky.)
Unpub1 ished*
Seawater
TAEA**
Windscale (U.K.)
Heatherington eta} 1976
Lake Michigan
Wahlgren et al 1976
Bombay Harbor (India)
Pillai and Mathew, 1976
Pacific Ocean
Miyake etal 1976
Enewetak Atoll]
Noshkin eta]1976
Los Alamos
Hakonson et al 1976
ORNL (Burial Ground)
Bondietti,
Rocky Flats (Colo.)
Johnson ,1974
1976
*Trench water samples, commercial radioactive waste burial ground.
Reynolds, ORNL, personal conmunication.
**IAEA intercal libration sample (IAEA-SW-I-3) taken nearshore to an
9
10
pH
Fig. 4. Estimated concentrations of hydrolyzed Pu(IV¥) species in
solutions saturated with crystalline Pu, (Baes and
Mesmer, 1976).
460
Miamt River (Ohio)
mn
.
VA AKPulOH)s Lf
Bondietti, 1976
n
.
oO
Pu (OH), 4 (oq)
in
Oak Ridge, Tn. (WOL)
ws
\
Investigator/Source
wo
\6
Study Site
ew
-log CONCENTRATIONS (moles/liter)
Figure Code
unspecified nuclear facility.
§. A.