in mice as a result of expagyre to a dry-particle simulant incorporating

2eday old fission material,The simulant employed was composed of

tracer amounts of fission»pxoduct chlorides adsorbed completely on dirt
particles in a wide size range, The simulant was gene rated‘as airborne

The

simulant is, however, notémecessarily of the samechemical form as

fallout which would tend torgpeximize the hazard as approximated here,

Earlier studies have tras A the fate of two other types of ajmulanta—
anionic simplant* and a
ft slurry simulant,? The former’ ‘épresé ts

the falloutithat might oce
Mowing a nuclear de chation in’aes water,
and the latter a detonationiin ‘a shallow harbor, The biological response

to anexpogure to fallout i Adependent on the "properties of thée?carrier
material, The results ob

Hedwith the drysparticle simulant in the’

typea of aimulants prod

ie previous studies,’

’other
copipayed with results obtained witH
present experiment wereuced
i
ae ee
ae

oe’

+

fi

In orde stp assess the ‘¥al ; tive importance”of inhalation and ingestion
‘as modes
10des ofentry
0
for theMaspion products in sti Body, thaede particle

EXPOBNEEs|

we

pel

af

aie

:

soa}

K

vey

“+
‘eal
.

veteta dl

é

poi

ind

yl

‘

ot

;

i

bavi

thitgs

rote

”

ph

aye

#

oghe

it if

at

ut
a

Ry

ise:

The simulant was prepared from neutroneirradjated uranjum obtained

from the Materials Testigg‘Reacitor, ° The mixture of fissiot-products
was dissolved in JIG) and qdded to a solution of previously prepared dirt
particles of Ambrose clay loam of less than’40 microns in diameter,®:
The partig}g -fisssion-progugt mixture was eyaporated to dryness ina
ball mill fo insure mixing, The resultant s{mulant consisted'of dirt
particles With an average giameter of from'] to 5 microns With the

fission products adsorbedon the surfaces. ‘The solubility of’ the activity

adsorbed on the clay part{gles was 8 per cent in'water and18'percent

in HCl at pH = |, The aniti@ls were exposed'to this simulant within 2_
after the removal ofthe irradiated uranium from the reactor,
days
ree
4D

4)

'

tA

\
«

‘ a

wet

* Materials Testing Reactor autorafervice PHIMips Perroteufh Go, Idaho Falls, Idaho,

de

S

&

aA

Saal

ze

oa

Pe AE
.

oe ths

‘fy tee

rr

Preparation of (heSimulans.

Oe wy

t $following, in} lation, ferty,

bes

:

iw.

EXPERIMENTA
ERIMEN 1,

and, the respo fe'e'to
thig’
7

ag

{ 2

i
.

bygavage

ae
. aeswet
oe at Bde hh ein
Phe ale BE TT
Zoo
ESal
EeSeiciderPET
ee, TRSFae
ROS.

simujant ’ as administere@s . mice

mode of a f hinistration wa at

on Me
teeaaaiekiyCityeh
tn Sy ae

encountered as a consequenge of a land-based nuclear detonation.

ws
:
ae le
Wt eptas eg ta
e t en ot i he tn “Te te Se
ge gate
enka
le
ya« al - ne Don ot ates
Sanssenate.
i
Ra a=,
tm ekee
.
a tee
Sy 6 heal
fi RT Rasaes
3Nab SS RD = ga hal redAORAA
ai
Hansr:
AES “a ShesPh Set ih Paes
cig ei EE
gePecg Ela
geeG
oe

particulates and representa,qualitatively, the fallout which’ tight be | ''

UNCHLASSIFLED

Select target paragraph3