social activities, and, if so, are there any actions that could be taken or restrictions imposed that would keep exposures within acceptable criteria?" Within this framework ci data and basic questions, the Task Group has ‘’ focused attention on the following options (see Fig. a . ee" 146, Appendix II): Ontion 7¢ ‘ a. No return of the Enewetak people. b. No radiological cleanup. This clearly represents a no-cost, no~-radiation-dose option. Just as clearly, it runs contrary to the expressed wishes of the Enewetak people. In addition, choice of this option cannot be defended using current radiation protection philosophy and standards since the predicted expos ures for persons living Drrd Aaanat AOAA 2 byt oe THOR on the southern islands, are well within acceptable standards .~ tion IL a. Return to the southern islands (ALVIN-KEITH). b. Agriculture limited to the southern islands. c. Travel restricted to the southern islands. d. No restrictions on fishing. e. No radiological cleanup. roe This im: option,with.zero cost for radiological cleanup that results en in population doses well 1 belowtheguides,(RowJ A of ‘Tables 1-4): It differs from later options in that it leaves the problems of contaminated scrap in many areas of the atoll, and the Pu in soil on YVONNE, IRENE, and in the burial sites on SALLY, plus generally contaminated areas on ALICE, BELLE, CLARA, and PEARL, unresolved. Such a choice would establish the need for off-limits areas in perpetuity, at least for YVONNE, since the metallic Pu is expected to be present on the surface of the island indefinitely unless cleanup is G19