é - a Te tee oe aio * DrSEE pe Pty area _ rh A uty 4f mate2 ef * ra wans TO dl ae ‘ . ou te? Coltha: pep pbs a— fc : ~~ 8 ¢ Lenpegdc a ByeeaeeVen geet Dé ta Leeee . 2 4 iu prtan GA Ve! ht BothAe Po. ON tthe wits as . df i e if co \ ppc or fe YVONNE may be a suitable ‘site.for, such--stockpidnevith-the-quarantine |e conténued-imtil proper disposal is accomplished.“ It is the hope of the Task Group that deliberation and decisions on disposal of plutonium contaminated soil and scrap will not delay other cleanup and rehabilitation actions. * fal ra As for considering disposal, there appears ‘to be thaee possibilities: 1. Disposal wherein there is an irrevocable commit rsent of the a contatminant to the environment. 2. Disposal wherein, with some difficulty, a later decision could bd. change the method of disposal. Lae An effort made to find a way to reduce the volume and amount of material } requiring disposal tetherWaynevere - 1 ee The foliowing ideas have been fut forth Serdisposal of plutonium contaminated soil and scrap: 1, Disposal of plutonium contaminated scrap in the deep lagoon or deep ocean. 2. Make the contaminated soil into concrete blocks with disposal in deep ocean or through burial on land. Disposal of contaminated soil in the form of cement poured into deep drill holes on land with the scrap added. Disposal of soil and scrap in the water filled craters on YVONNE with a thick concrete cover. Return of these materials for burial in the U.S. in packaged form or —> as concrete blocks. . le mo, ro meds iat aR nk Lp Lb the fron el COip een IOLore on gy Any ocean disposal. plans must be coondeneted, jaehe,Eavsronmental Tor ee tay. — ty. 2 : ls . “eke‘oki mw! a hyo! t 1 (7 Me ‘ 8 veel a” } ; 4 haut omer. PBA Dt Rehoh ME Porn | ra } . fr 2 eet athaa od noe - 5 : fr of 3 week a Bee yk / ‘ , . tt he det toon Feta — 4A pid. ea, i whe : . he . 7 4 f 016