The estimates for 30 year whole body doses in the Survey Report are Of tie ie tk feng Pr tar? summarized in Table 1, and 30 vear bone dose estimates are summarized in é Table 2, Note that the option for "Gravel Village Area - Plow Village Island," achives a minimal reduction in radiation exposure of whole vody and bone for ail living patterns, and those living on JANET would have to import most foods to avoid exceeding a whole body exposure of 4 rems in 30 years.> Population dose guidelines used by the Task Group _1 — a include annual dose rates as well as 30 year intergrals for genetic doses.,; Tables 3 and 4 show estimates of the maximum annual whole body and bone dose. * ‘ In considering the reduction in exposure that may be achievable through removal of contaminated soil, the Task Group has taken the position that these predicted exposures are approximations only. The effectiveness of such actions lt tant therk ins ™ Ape: Yaw to reduce internal exposures: must be confirmed through analysis of test plantings> r a“ Taeaansanomant of dose reductions that might be possible due to removal of contaminated soil, the Task Group posed the following questions: “Given the dose estimates of ables -4, and the dose reductions that can tha hare! ratty Zz oS be expected due to, modifications-of-the-diesy can equivalent dose reductions be achieved by removal of soil and, if so, what volume of soil would have to be removed from contaminated islands"? In order to address this question a; at a detatled‘description«of the(saleulations. leading to ‘theestimates. in Tables 4 \ atid 4 is given. in Appenitx TV. See . | weThe Task Group does not favor soil removal as a dependable or feasible . “thy + / Spook:vA gr. fa exposure reduction action./owever, such action is reviewed in the Task Group Report in order to present a complete picture of the various possibilities : considered. | 007