The decline in deficit (difference between revenues and expenses) for community

operation, or in other words, the decrease in "subsidy" and the conversion to a status of

self-support, and better, is indicated in the following table:
Fiscal Year

Revenue

Expense

1949
1950
1951
1952
1953
1954 Estimate
1955 Estimate

$2, 683, 192
3, 311, 628
4,440, 829
4,997,199
4,914, 084
5, 067, 652
5, 160, 880

$7, 086, 892
5,195, 361
5,622, 144
5, 314, 456
4, 786, 295
4, 956, 049
5, 020, 384

Difference

Loss
Loss
Loss
Loss
Gain
Gain
Gain

$4, 403, 700
1, 883, 733
1,181, 315
317, 257
127, 789
111, 603
140, 496

Many factors contributed to the change reported in the foregoing table. Some free
services were discontinued entirely. Other services formerly free were performed at a
charge to the residents. At all times a much greater consciousness of costs was generated
in all those who had a part in or control over the magnitude of the expenses,
Adjustments in Rental and Utility Rates -- There was also a slight adjustment in resi-

dential rental rates which could have caused an over-all increase of approximately 5 per
cent in revenue from that source. However, in fiscal year 1953, the anticipated increase in
revenue was cancelled by increasing vacancy in residential real estate for reasons that
will be described later. The other main source of revenue, namely, that from the com-

mercial establishments, has risen slightly. The income from this source is mostly derived
from license agreements for the use of commercial property which provide for the payment
of a percentage of gross sales as the monetary consideration for the use of the space.

One of the early approaches to reducing subsidy was to inquire whether rents for
residential property were at a proper level. The policy was established by the AEC that
residential rentals should be set at an amount which compared with rentals in this geographical area for similar premises, and that the rental scale at Los Alamos itself should be
such as to properly reflect the extreme differences in the types of housing units available.
After consideration during several months by a local committee, it was finally decided that
this problem might best be solved by hiring a residential real estate rental appraiser or
appraisers to survey Los Alamos and vicinity and make recommendations. In September

1950, the services of two appraisers—Treadwell and Goldstein—were contracted for and
their report was submitted in December 1950. This was reviewed and a recommendation
made in January 1951, for the adoption of the appraisers' report as a new rental scale to
be put into effect at Los Alamos. During this same time, national policy on the subject

of rental rates for Federally~owned housing was being formulated.

It was first announced

in Circular A-45 issued by the Bureau of the Budget under the date of June 9, 1951.

The

new residential rental rates recommended for Los Alamos were reviewed in the light of the
Directive A-45, were found to be in accord, and were put into effect on vemenron
During the period covered by the foregoing, intensive study was also being given to
the text of the family housing license agreement which had been in use since Army days at

Los Alamos, and it was found that many changes and improvements were desirable. A new
form of agreement was devised, following as much as possible normal real estate practice

and modified to take into account conditions at Los Alamos.

When the adjusted rents went

into effect on January 1, 1952, the new form of license agreement was put into effect for

all units.

a

EAL

ney,

77

Select target paragraph3