eitn tte relativels aign roil rate of tne siebo's reswitea in a teli anulatien on tre MDOT records: false mulls coused ds Bais roel aStiation ecre
etten cifficule to distingaren froa tree malls.
=
vlees¢ s ems
: feStie
Meet

~

on
.

ceo
-

“VIN?
eee’

The alin itecestiresreiliins

wo for coe of tins eita &

er
:

the tneeretical ami tne experizental relation-asras tmuot
Trae

trey

are

it uprrare

impossible

correct.

The approach which was used to obtain final trajectories presented here
was to Cumpute Crajectories using smwn Teak and Orange atesrological conii-

tions and launcher setcings, together with che present best estizate vf drag
coefficient anJ noa@inal rocket izmpuise values.

Teak and Oranse di-bo trajec-

tory estimates are showm in Figs. €.5 through 6.5.

Ispact tines were chen.

adjusted to the observed value by warying secunl-stage impulse.

aAmilssis han

indicated thar only minor altitude differences result €roa tne varicus pus-

sidie techniques for controlling impact tise.

Herizental meion (Figs. 6.6

and 6.8) resulting from this approach is that which would result for nv dispersion, since mo data are available on actual horizontal positions,

Disper-

sion is essentially a come, centered about che mocinal trajectory; consequently,
borizuntal aurion liaics can be decarained by adding the signa or é-sigaa dispersion angle ‘dispersion cone hali-angle) to tne launch angle in the desired
direction and readjusting the impact tine.

Dispersion liaits for this vehicle

are approviantels 3 degrees at the I-sigma level and 5 degrees at the 2-sigay
level.

These trajectories have net been run, since the total mober of runs

involved would be rather large.

Linits on horizontal oorion can be deterained

easily if the sigma level and direction are specified.

The trajectory analysis,

to be published, will describe the technique in detail.
Accuracy Jlisits on the vertical aotion have not Scen cosplerely werimared .
However, thes are expected to be very close to _ 5000 feet for a 50-percent

confidence and _ 10,000 feer for a @-percent confidence.
refer to variation in apogee aleitcde.)
able

(These aumbers

‘

Three techniques sere finally avail-

for computing tne aposee alcitude of the series at Poinr Arsuello:

“L) experivental “MDDOT was again explosed, although the geometry of the setup
was ver: good chis tire), °Z) time of flight, and (3) theurecicul.
ical

technicce is basically,

The thorct-

independent of che experirzental aporeaca.

Puint

Arsuelio cesuits essentiall: verificd the input paraceters and secre not used
to derive thea.

Fron the scatter of tne altitude points ubtained from each

°

Select target paragraph3