a

total over to the matrix which survoundcs the root, and we attonst
to relate tho concentration fnctos hore to that incediate root

“sing the nutrient in

at

i

cd

Hoo]

et

ty

ww

ia
<4

ry

feal it ives a nuch create

2

We have a rough method of cstimating this, but we
Ss

exvironuent.

censaragisc,

very brict sanple, yorhars a

srecies,

be
“gq

9

<

@

3

oo

tg

he
@

yy

eo

‘3
(w)

0

*

Yi

r

i

pte

3

+)

(2

by

Strontiun is pretty wnifornly distributed,

kas perhays a ten-fold variation.

oveor of ten,

°

cr
ju.
a
QO

eb

p

3

oO

s)

“3
2

betvecn, porhnans, rons

9
Ww)

general,

Caecsinm

In coneval, with this acnittediry

difference of magnitrde is on the

Cne crdow of magnitude exists botveon different

2
Yan suro if you lecok far enough,
you can find some
°

that excesded this, but this scems to to tho gencral limit of
the effoct of cifferent svecios,
.

Likevise, diiferent orsanisms, cifierent parts of tho

plant chow differing upiakes, and you will soa in general the
leaves are the highest part of the plant,
nate because leayes are a nice

This is perhaps fortu-

thing fer sampling.

It is alvays

interesting to know that in goneral the ssed portion, the sesd
has the lowest concentratien,

This is trua because in so nany

—,

instances we do use tho seca part for human conswaption,
The next slides shows the effest of Pics the sluzs
become more acid or is adjusted to become more acid, and you have
@ more rapid upiaks,

Whether this is a physiocloctical ressonse

of the plant or a solubility phenomenon, we have not spent tine

Select target paragraph3