299 natever wo are studyiny in tho dry soil. Here we soo cortain clcmoats, pocause there is roaliy not much djiference in the ebsorpticn of strontium-59 or GStrontivn-c) ov the ditferemnt icdines. Whether it is strontiun-29 or strontiua-©9, the plent coos not distinguish, so the streatina dis hove absorrcsd and it ds atsorbpod in histh or higher quantities than any of the others. With barden, it is not quite so much, Icdine is absorbed comeavably to siventiun., There is a larssa a got a differing absorption. get in the wide elements, iF oO ft QO B ct fe boty Oo 4 oO 9) oO fs fut 17) QO There is a sligat difference [Me B poorly. This quite varying betwoen what you You night say the absorption of solis is the mazsimium of ton -- the influcncs of the soil. » The next slide shows the uptake fron the nutrient sluss. With a nutrient slut, you can conivol a single environment substrate factor more readily than you can by medifying a soil. If you modify it by chansing FH, or something, then you are goinz to modify a number of thinzs. Tho results from here on fAindicatirg) are expressed as cencentration factors frem nutrient slugs. As the question a moment aso proposed, this conceniration factor is taken as the ccncentration in the plant as compared with the immediate reot environment, not the immediate nutrient in general, If you add thess, in genoral, thoy add almost in 4