CHAPTER 4

THE RADIOIODINE PROBLEM -- INHALATION
The discovery a decade later of severely damaged thyroids in those

Marshallese who were exposed as children to the fallout from the March 1,
1954, BRAVO shot, in two ins tances amounting to complete ablation, and

almost surely due to radioiodine,*~>
raised the question of the pathway
by which that exposure occurred.
In earlier analyses, it was generally

assumed that ingestion through food and drinking water was the principal
pathway, and not inhalation.
Direct data on the thyroid exposure were
not available, partly because the problem was not appreciated then, and
partly because gamma spectral analysis was in its infancy.
Direct

measurement of thyroid burden was not possible as it is today. On the
other hand, it is readily demonstrable that there were massive external
and internal exposures to a wide mix of fission products, including
the radioiodines.
,
The severity of the thyroid damage suffered by the Marshallese has
raised the specter of a possible neglected but important danger from
radioiodine in fallout particles.

It also became important to investigate

the possible routes of entry-- ingestion or inhalation. This has led to
recent studies by Cole” and Norman’ on the threat of inhalation of
radioiodine.

In the fission process, the iodine radionuclides (I-131, 132, 133 and
135) are mainly produced as decay products of the precursor nuclides
of Sb and Te, Although these precursors are less volatile than iodine
itself, almost all the iodine radionuclides would be expected to
condense late in the temperature history of the nuclear cloud and thus
on the surface of the fallout particles, This tendency for surface
condensation would make the radioiodines liable to leaching and later

assimilation by plants and animals.

In addition, significant volatiliza-

tion of iodine takes place in the evaporation of water solutions of iodide,
and when moist warm air is passed over iodine-coated, pseudo-fallout

particles.

(carbonate)

This effect can be orders of magnitude greater on coral
than on siliceous particles.

Cole found one set of circumstances in which he concluded that

inhalation of radioiodine would be a real and significant hazard

following nuclear attack: where people are in a fallout shelter near
the most intense_part of a fallout field,* and there is appreciable

standing water near the shelter ventilator intakes, and an extended
thermal inversion. Fallout in rain he excluded because rain seldom

occurs in coincidence with a strong inversion.

Examination of data from atmospheric tests does not yield a basis
for clear-cut conclusions about the hazard of iodine inhalation.
The

*Because iodine is usually fractionated out of the larger particles that
fall in the intense part of the fallout field, these circumstances are

generally limited to overlapping fallout fields.
16

Select target paragraph3