a en etn eagle eee oa ante nell ke B. Alternatives: l. 2. VIII. ERDA supply list of scientists to Court and Court appoints the Committee. ERDA and Plaintiffsagree on a 5-man panel, RADIOLOGICAL ANALYSES OF FLORA AND FAUNA Considered to be part of VII above. IX. CONTROL OF AGENCY SPENDING AND CONTRACTS A. Can't agree, and don't think plaintiffs' proposal is workable in any event. Propose that Government statement, or stipulation of parties, be submitted which specifies the commitments discussed above, B. C. X. While we don't think anything more is necessary, we would be prepared to provide periodic status reports to the Court on continuing developments. Decision re EIS should be Interior decision. Should action on EIS be initiated, ERDA will assist DOI with this effort as requested. FURTHER MONITORING A. Can't agree to anything beyond what's stated in IX above. Dus lalitnr BEST AVAILABLE copy Qvy A, Cumin her OGC. DOE ARCHIVES J.0. herman M.8.~ Biles an tay OFOS| yw). Ww). Burr - Or T- [. We ~ > Ful,Weg dg. L. Mahar. A&& i. dean, AC te trig h “( oGe